Re: A new way to run mach

2013-04-17 Thread Matt Brubeck
On 4/17/2013 10:50 AM, Gavin Sharp wrote: I think Rob was talking about the case where you would call e.g.: "mach build browser/base" mach could know that on Mac, that also requires the equivalent of "mach build browser/app" for those changes to actually be repackaged into the bundle in objdir/

Re: A new way to run mach

2013-04-17 Thread Gavin Sharp
I think Rob was talking about the case where you would call e.g.: "mach build browser/base" mach could know that on Mac, that also requires the equivalent of "mach build browser/app" for those changes to actually be repackaged into the bundle in objdir/dist/, because the build system doesn't. Of

Re: A new way to run mach

2013-04-17 Thread Matt Brubeck
On 4/15/2013 11:04 AM, Rob Campbell wrote: On Mac, does mach do the right thing when you rebuild browser, does it also rebuild browser/app so your application bundle gets updated? "mach build browser" is the same as "make -C $objdir/browser" (literally, it just executes that "make" command to d

Re: A new way to run mach

2013-04-17 Thread Rob Campbell
On 2013-04-17, at 11:42 , Matt Brubeck wrote: > On 4/15/2013 11:04 AM, Rob Campbell wrote: >> On Mac, does mach do the right thing when you rebuild browser, does it also >> rebuild browser/app so your application bundle gets updated? > "mach build browser" is the same as "make -C $objdir/browse

Re: A new way to run mach

2013-04-15 Thread Rob Campbell
Well this is pretty sweet. On Mac, does mach do the right thing when you rebuild browser, does it also rebuild browser/app so your application bundle gets updated? Thanks for doing this, Matt! Rob On 2013-03-16, at 3:48 PM, Matt Brubeck wrote: > I recently landed a new feature for the "mach"