>
CC: Ting-Yu Chou mailto:tc...@mozilla.com>>,
"dev-g...@lists.mozilla.org<mailto:dev-g...@lists.mozilla.org>"
mailto:dev-g...@lists.mozilla.org>>,
"dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org<mailto:dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org>"
mailto:dev-platform@lists.mozilla.or
It would be good to know how this plays with the visibility api? When does
the outgoing document become "hidden" - at the end of the animation? And
likewise for the incoming document. If visibility state is being used for
say stopping some media being played, it makes sense to flip the state
before
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Christopher Lord wrote:
> I'd appreciate any feedback (even if it's "You're an idiot and this is not
> how we go about this") before taking this any further.
Doesn't this increase the effective page transition latency by adding
the animation duration to the page
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 6:49 AM, Christopher Lord wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 4:26 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>
>> This is awesome!! I completely agree that the Google proposal is much
>> too complicated for an initial take on solving transitions.
>>
>> I agree with Anne that this should
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 4:26 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> This is awesome!! I completely agree that the Google proposal is much
> too complicated for an initial take on solving transitions.
>
> I agree with Anne that this should be doable by adding CSS rules to a
> normal stylesheet rather than usi
This is awesome!! I completely agree that the Google proposal is much
too complicated for an initial take on solving transitions.
I agree with Anne that this should be doable by adding CSS rules to a
normal stylesheet rather than using a special linking mechanism. If
that sounds good to you, then
Seems it has, sorry about that - here's a new one:
http://chrislord.net/?p=273&preview=1&_ppp=d17048fbc3
I plan on publishing this (on my blog) today. The proposal and shim source
is also visible permanently in git: https://gitlab.com/Cwiiis/gaia-navigator
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 5:23 AM, Ting-Yu
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 1:02 AM, Christopher Lord wrote:
> down. I'm not a huge fan of all aspects of their proposal, so I've made my
> own: http://chrislord.net/?p=273&preview=1&_ppp=0afe20d87f
>
Seems the link is outdated?
___
dev-platform mailing li
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Christopher Lord wrote:
> That sounds like a nice idea, though I wonder how you'd specify the duration
> of the application of the stylesheet via a media query?
I would put it in the stylesheet somehow I think. Putting yet more
style in markup as this proposal doe
That sounds like a nice idea, though I wonder how you'd specify the
duration of the application of the stylesheet via a media query?
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 8:50 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Christopher Lord
> wrote:
> > http://chrislord.net/?p=273&preview=1&
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Christopher Lord wrote:
> http://chrislord.net/?p=273&preview=1&_ppp=0afe20d87f
I haven't reviewed it completely, but it seems at the very least you
should use media queries rather than require separate stylesheets.
--
https://annevankesteren.nl/
_
Hi people,
I've spent the last week or so articulating some thoughts on navigation
transitions. This is something I've thought about before (as I'm sure a lot
of us have), but seeing Google's proposal encouraged me to get it written
down. I'm not a huge fan of all aspects of their proposal, so I'v
12 matches
Mail list logo
