On Wednesday 2018-05-02 15:56 -0700, L. David Baron wrote:
> The W3C is proposing a revised charter for:
>
> WebRTC Working Group
> https://www.w3.org/2018/04/webrtc-charter.html
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2018Apr/0008.html
>
> Mozilla has the opportunity to send
The W3C is proposing a revised charter for:
WebRTC Working Group
https://www.w3.org/2018/04/webrtc-charter.html
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2018Apr/0008.html
Mozilla has the opportunity to send comments or objections through
Friday, May 25.
The changes relative to
The W3C is proposing a revised charter for:
WebRTC Working Group
http://www.w3.org/2015/06/webrtc-charter.html
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2015Jun/0009.html
Mozilla has the opportunity to send comments or objections through
Sunday, July 19.
Please reply to this thr
On Friday 2015-06-12 17:23 -0500, Adam Roach wrote:
> On 6/12/15 13:27, L. David Baron wrote:
> >The W3C is proposing a revised charter for:
> >
> > Web Performance Working Group
> > http://www.w3.org/2015/05/webperf-charter.html
> > https://w3c.github.io/charter-webperf/
> > https://lists.
On 6/12/15 13:27, L. David Baron wrote:
The W3C is proposing a revised charter for:
Web Performance Working Group
http://www.w3.org/2015/05/webperf-charter.html
https://w3c.github.io/charter-webperf/
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-perf/2015Jun/0066.html
I think th
FWIW, this is a "consensus" charter that came out of a long discussion that
we were
in. It's not perfect, but I believe it's generally sound...
-Ekr
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 2:27 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
> The W3C is proposing a revised charter for:
>
> Web Performance Working Group
> http
The W3C is proposing a revised charter for:
Web Performance Working Group
http://www.w3.org/2015/05/webperf-charter.html
https://w3c.github.io/charter-webperf/
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-perf/2015Jun/0066.html
Mozilla has the opportunity to send comments or objections
On 3/6/15 17:27, Martin Thomson wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Adam Roach wrote:
The only thing that I think we'd want to see in here that is currently
missing is an explicit statement that the "new set of low level
object-oriented APIs for real-time communication" (called "WebRTC NG" i
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Adam Roach wrote:
> The only thing that I think we'd want to see in here that is currently
> missing is an explicit statement that the "new set of low level
> object-oriented APIs for real-time communication" (called "WebRTC NG" in
> the deliverables) will be backwa
+1
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Adam Roach wrote:
> On 3/2/15 12:53, L. David Baron wrote:
> > The W3C is proposing a revised charter for:
> >
> > Web Real-Time Communications Working Group
> > http://www.w3.org/2015/02/webrtc-charter.html
> > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public
On 3/2/15 12:53, L. David Baron wrote:
> The W3C is proposing a revised charter for:
>
> Web Real-Time Communications Working Group
> http://www.w3.org/2015/02/webrtc-charter.html
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2015Feb/0004.html
>
> Mozilla has the opportunity to send
>The W3C is proposing a revised charter for:
>
> Web Real-Time Communications Working Group
>Please reply to this thread if you think there's something we should
>say as part of this charter review. (Given our involvement, it
>seems to me like we should support the charter in general, possibly
>
The W3C is proposing a revised charter for:
Web Real-Time Communications Working Group
http://www.w3.org/2015/02/webrtc-charter.html
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2015Feb/0004.html
Mozilla has the opportunity to send comments or objections through
Friday, March 13.
P
13 matches
Mail list logo
