On Thursday 2018-05-17 10:14 +0200, L. David Baron wrote:
> On Thursday 2018-05-03 16:57 -0700, L. David Baron wrote:
> > On Thursday 2018-05-03 08:56 +0200, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 12:42 AM, L. David Baron wrote:
> > > > Timed Text Working Group
> > > > https://w
On Thursday 2018-05-03 16:57 -0700, L. David Baron wrote:
> On Thursday 2018-05-03 08:56 +0200, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> > On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 12:42 AM, L. David Baron wrote:
> > > Timed Text Working Group
> > > https://www.w3.org/2018/04/proposed-tt-charter-2018.html
> >
> > What does
>
On Thursday 2018-05-03 08:56 +0200, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 12:42 AM, L. David Baron wrote:
> > Timed Text Working Group
> > https://www.w3.org/2018/04/proposed-tt-charter-2018.html
>
> What does
>
> # The Group is expected to produce annual updates for the Recommen
On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 12:42 AM, L. David Baron wrote:
> Timed Text Working Group
> https://www.w3.org/2018/04/proposed-tt-charter-2018.html
What does
# The Group is expected to produce annual updates for the Recommendation
# with previously unspecified features.
mean?
--
https://annevan
The W3C is proposing a revised charter for:
Timed Text Working Group
https://www.w3.org/2018/04/proposed-tt-charter-2018.html
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2018Apr/0003.html
Mozilla has the opportunity to send comments or objections through
Thursday, May 17.
The chan
Tru DAT
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
I'm not sure there's much to say here. I think we should remain
uninterested in the TTML efforts. Work to define translation from
CEA608 and CEA708 to WebVTT is worthwhile, and I'd like to see it
supported. Unfortunately our interest in WebVTT has been mostly
theoretical recently, so I don't see us
The W3C is proposing a charter for:
Timed Text Working Group
http://w3c.github.io/charter-drafts/timed-text-charter-2016.html
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2016Apr/0010.html
The diff between this charter and the group's previous charter is:
http://services.w3.org
On 22/03/2014 07:30 , L. David Baron wrote:
I'm inclined to think that it's not worth putting up a massive fight
over the group's organization here, which I think is what it would
take to change this plan. I think I'd rather focus the bandwidth of
our communication with W3C management on other i
On Monday 2014-03-17 13:31 -0400, Richard Eyre wrote:
> Thanks for adding me Anne, you did get my email correct :-).
>
> Personally, I'm not interested in developing TTML. I still agree to all the
> points from our previous discussion from the page you linked, Anne.
>
> I'm not really sure whethe
Thanks for adding me Anne, you did get my email correct :-).
Personally, I'm not interested in developing TTML. I still agree to all the
points from our previous discussion from the page you linked, Anne.
I'm not really sure whether having a joint working group would be of
benefit, particularly i
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:56 AM, L. David Baron wrote:
> The W3C is proposing a revised charter for:
>
> Timed Text Working Group
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2014Feb/0004.html
> http://www.w3.org/2013/10/timed-text-charter.html
> deadline for comments: March 20
>
The W3C is proposing a revised charter for:
Timed Text Working Group
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2014Feb/0004.html
http://www.w3.org/2013/10/timed-text-charter.html
deadline for comments: March 20
This new charter is quite substantive, in that it recharters a
worki
13 matches
Mail list logo
