I want to highlight why Its also an important change - there is a very real
and important error: your channel content is truncated. Its a bug that
necko doesn't tell you about that right now. So we're going to fix that up.
The download manager is the obvious victim of this right now. It declares
s
On 4/22/14, 10:06 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
That seems like a huge behavior change. :(
Yes, it is. There's some at-length discussion in the bug about what
behavior various consumers want here.
-Boris
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@list
On 2014-04-22, 9:59 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 4/22/14, 9:30 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
Do we currently return NS_OK from Necko in such circumstances or another
error code?
Currently we return NS_OK, so the necko client thinks the transfer
completed successfully.
That seems like a huge behavi
On 4/22/14, 9:30 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
Do we currently return NS_OK from Necko in such circumstances or another
error code?
Currently we return NS_OK, so the necko client thinks the transfer
completed successfully.
-Boris
___
dev-platform maili
Do we currently return NS_OK from Necko in such circumstances or another
error code?
On 2014-04-22, 4:21 PM, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
Hey all,
In the networking team we're about to introduce an error code for
"partial transfers" (see
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=237623). It will
Hey all,
In the networking team we're about to introduce an error code for "partial
transfers" (see https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=237623). It will
be returned when the underlying protocol's framing is cut off and we know that
the transfer was indeed partial - not all data arrive
6 matches
Mail list logo
