On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 2:30 PM Ryan VanderMeulen wrote:
> As was noted in the bug, deciding to explicitly un-support MSVC is a
> decision which merits wider discussion and is not something I wanted to
> tackle in that bug.
>
>
Has such a discussion been planned or already happened? If not, can w
As was noted in the bug, deciding to explicitly un-support MSVC is a
decision which merits wider discussion and is not something I wanted to
tackle in that bug.
-Ryan
On 10/12/2018 4:08 PM, Dave Townsend wrote:
If we've made the decision to stick with clang-cl, why would we continue to
suppor
If we've made the decision to stick with clang-cl, why would we continue to
support MSVC builds going forwards?
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 1:06 PM Ryan VanderMeulen
wrote:
> When we made the decision to switch to clang-cl for our Windows builds,
> MSVC builds and tests were kept running as Tier 2 j
When we made the decision to switch to clang-cl for our Windows builds,
MSVC builds and tests were kept running as Tier 2 jobs in CI to ensure that
they continued working in the event of an emergency switch-back caused by
any last-minute clang-cl compatibility issues. Thankfully, no such issues
hav
4 matches
Mail list logo