Re: Jemalloc 3 is now on by default

2015-09-03 Thread Mike Hommey
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 10:13:34AM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote: > Hi, > > I just landed bug 762449 on inbound, which enables Jemalloc 3 on the > nightly channel. This puts us a step forward to removing mozjemalloc, > our highly patched fork of jemalloc 0.9. More importantly, it will allow > us to mor

Re: Jemalloc 3 is now on by default

2015-03-01 Thread Mike Hommey
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 12:44:19PM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 10:13:34AM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I just landed bug 762449 on inbound, which enables Jemalloc 3 on the > > nightly channel. This puts us a step forward to removing mozjemalloc, > > our highly

Re: Jemalloc 3 is now on by default

2015-01-12 Thread Joshua Cranmer 🐧
On 1/12/2015 9:44 PM, Mike Hommey wrote: Aaand as usual with such changes, it didn't stick. Does that mean I should assume that whenever someone makes this sort of announcement, I should assume they really mean "this will take effect tomorrow or the day after, when I've figured out what went

Re: Jemalloc 3 is now on by default

2015-01-12 Thread Mike Hommey
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 10:13:34AM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote: > Hi, > > I just landed bug 762449 on inbound, which enables Jemalloc 3 on the > nightly channel. This puts us a step forward to removing mozjemalloc, > our highly patched fork of jemalloc 0.9. More importantly, it will allow > us to mor

Jemalloc 3 is now on by default

2015-01-12 Thread Mike Hommey
Hi, I just landed bug 762449 on inbound, which enables Jemalloc 3 on the nightly channel. This puts us a step forward to removing mozjemalloc, our highly patched fork of jemalloc 0.9. More importantly, it will allow us to more closely work with upstream, by proposing patches that do apply there (w