Re: Intent to unship: remote jar: protocol pref

2018-01-16 Thread Gijs Kruitbosch
On 17/01/2018 00:01, Daniel Veditz wrote: On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 2:12 PM, Gijs Kruitbosch wrote: the most likely group of people to have enabled this (given 0 public reports on breakage so far, as far as I'm aware) are people on ESR or otherwise in enterprise environments ​Or those trying

Re: Intent to unship: remote jar: protocol pref

2018-01-16 Thread Daniel Veditz
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 2:12 PM, Gijs Kruitbosch wrote: > the most likely group of people to have enabled this (given 0 public > reports on breakage so far, as far as I'm aware) are people on ESR or > otherwise in enterprise environments > ​Or those trying to run multi-file testcases packaged as

Re: Intent to unship: remote jar: protocol pref

2018-01-12 Thread Gijs Kruitbosch
I should have been explicit about my considerations for telemetry; apologies for not doing so upfront. The bug for the removal of telemetry code claims usage was 0.01% of sessions 9 months ago, before the pref was flipped. I think that's fine in terms of removing things. I don't think we sho

Re: Intent to unship: remote jar: protocol pref

2018-01-12 Thread Gijs Kruitbosch
On 12/01/2018 22:12, Gijs Kruitbosch wrote: As Kris already pointed out in his footnote, the most likely group of people to have enabled this (given 0 public reports on breakage so far, as far as I'm aware) are people on ESR or otherwise in enterprise environments, and our collection rates on t

Re: Intent to unship: remote jar: protocol pref

2018-01-12 Thread Tom Ritter
Telemetry was removed in 55: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1358004 You can still query it on tmo for 54... except it seems to give me a JS error. -tom On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 3:55 PM, Kris Maglione wrote: > Do we have telemetry on the usage of the preference or of remote JAR > ch

Re: Intent to unship: remote jar: protocol pref

2018-01-12 Thread Kris Maglione
Do we have telemetry on the usage of the preference or of remote JAR channels? If not, it shouldn't be hard to add, and would be a lot safer than guessing[1]. Either way, I definitely agree that it would be nice to get rid of this. -Kris [1]: Except, of course, that it wouldn't tell us much a

Intent to unship: remote jar: protocol pref

2018-01-12 Thread Gijs Kruitbosch
Hello, jar: is an internal protocol that enables loading resources from inside a jar/zip file . Firefox is the only browser I'm aware of that supports it. In Firefox 55, due to security concerns, we put using jar: with remote content (ie loaded over http(s), ftp - anything apart from file://,