Re: Intent to ship: aligning with the spec on document.open behavior and removing wyciwyg

2019-02-22 Thread Mike Taylor
On 2/22/19 4:14 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: There is a certain amount of compat risk here, since this is changing a very longstanding behavior.  I'm hoping that by aligning with the spec (except for a few edge cases like calling document.open() on a document whose iframe has been removed from the

Re: Intent to ship: aligning with the spec on document.open behavior and removing wyciwyg

2019-02-22 Thread Gijs Kruitbosch
On 22/02/2019 22:14, Boris Zbarsky wrote: All the "wyciwyg" bits in the tree are being removed in the process. \o/ ~ Gijs ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Intent to ship: aligning with the spec on document.open behavior and removing wyciwyg

2019-02-22 Thread Boris Zbarsky
Summary: historically in Gecko document.open created a new global and new session history entry (unless "replace" was passed). We also stored the written data in a "wyciwyg" cache entry so it could participate meaningfully in session history. I plan to change these behaviors and simplify the