Hi Rik,
Sorry for the late reply.
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 10:10 PM Rik Cabanier wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 6:07 AM Ehsan Akhgari
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2019, 9:39 PM Rik Cabanier, wrote:
>>
>>> Why are these sites not included in the "safe browsing" service that is
>>> used b
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 6:07 AM Ehsan Akhgari
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2019, 9:39 PM Rik Cabanier, wrote:
>
>> Why are these sites not included in the "safe browsing" service that is
>> used by most browsers?
>> That way, everyone would be protected.
>>
>
> Because the relevant part of safe brow
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019, 9:39 PM Rik Cabanier, wrote:
> Why are these sites not included in the "safe browsing" service that is
> used by most browsers?
> That way, everyone would be protected.
>
Because the relevant part of safe browsing service covers a different set
of criteria: https://www.goog
Why are these sites not included in the "safe browsing" service that is
used by most browsers?
That way, everyone would be protected.
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 2:59 PM Steven Englehardt
wrote:
> Summary:
> We are expanding the set of resources blocked by Content Blocking to
> include domains found
Summary:
We are expanding the set of resources blocked by Content Blocking to
include domains found to participate in cryptomining and fingerprinting.
Cryptomining has a significant impact on a device’s resources [0], and the
scripts are almost exclusively deployed without notice to the user [1].
F
5 matches
Mail list logo
