Re: Intent to implement: Proposal for SVG iframe element

2014-06-23 Thread Cameron McCormack
On 24/06/14 11:10, Robert O'Callahan wrote: Instead I think we should focus on extending HTML and making it easier to use from SVG, e.g. by eliminating the need to wrap it in . This is another argument for going forward with http://dev.w3.org/SVG/proposals/improving-svg-dom/ (at least the na

Re: Intent to implement: Proposal for SVG iframe element

2014-06-23 Thread Robert O'Callahan
See the thread in www-svg starting here: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2014Jun/0063.html For the reasons mentioned in that thread, I'm against adding SVG elements like that duplicate existing HTML elements, and I'm not the only one. Instead I think we should focus on extending HTML

Intent to implement: Proposal for SVG iframe element

2014-06-23 Thread HIKOSAKA Ryou
Summary: We are implementing SVG iframe element. It introduces the function that is almost equivalent to 'iframe' element of html5.0 into svg. Except for any SVG-specific rules explicitly mentioned in this specification. It allows dynamic loading and embedding of browsing contexts into svg. Beca