Re: Intent to Ship: Updated third-party iframe storage behavior

2015-08-19 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
On 2015-08-19 2:48 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 11:12 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: (We should probably rename that to "Accept third-part[y] cookies and data:".) Should we? I was kind of hoping we could maintain the illusion that all storage is cookies since it would keep t

Re: Intent to Ship: Updated third-party iframe storage behavior

2015-08-19 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
On 2015-08-18 7:47 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: On 2015-08-18 5:37 PM, Tanvi Vyas wrote: It is nice to see that we are moving towards an "Accept third party cookies and data" setting instead of just "Allow third party cookies". Will localstorag

Re: Intent to Ship: Updated third-party iframe storage behavior

2015-08-18 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 11:12 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: > (We should probably rename that to "Accept third-part[y] cookies and data:".) Should we? I was kind of hoping we could maintain the illusion that all storage is cookies since it would keep the UI simple. Users have enough trouble understand

Re: Intent to Ship: Updated third-party iframe storage behavior

2015-08-18 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: > On 2015-08-18 5:37 PM, Tanvi Vyas wrote: >> It is nice to see that we are moving towards an "Accept third party >> cookies and data" setting instead of just "Allow third party cookies". >> Will localstorage and sessionstorage also start honor

Re: Intent to Ship: Updated third-party iframe storage behavior

2015-08-18 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
On 2015-08-18 5:37 PM, Tanvi Vyas wrote: It is nice to see that we are moving towards an "Accept third party cookies and data" setting instead of just "Allow third party cookies". Will localstorage and sessionstorage also start honoring the users blocking preferences soon? Yes, that is part of

Re: Intent to Ship: Updated third-party iframe storage behavior

2015-08-18 Thread Tanvi Vyas
It is nice to see that we are moving towards an "Accept third party cookies and data" setting instead of just "Allow third party cookies". Will localstorage and sessionstorage also start honoring the users blocking preferences soon? On 8/18/15 8:20 AM, Michael Layzell wrote: Summary: Currentl

Re: Intent to Ship: Updated third-party iframe storage behavior

2015-08-18 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
On 2015-08-18 2:24 PM, David Illsley wrote: Is this pref something that's exposed to users, or is it only about:config (I can't seem to find any UI for it)? It is. Go to Privacy, select "Use custom settings for history", and under "Accept third-party cookies:" select Never. (We should probab

Re: Intent to Ship: Updated third-party iframe storage behavior

2015-08-18 Thread David Illsley
Is this pref something that's exposed to users, or is it only about:config (I can't seem to find any UI for it)? If so, this seems like a step away from being able to ever expose it as more apps will be built assuming IndexedDB will be unconditionally available in 3rd party iframes. This change wo

Intent to Ship: Updated third-party iframe storage behavior

2015-08-18 Thread Michael Layzell
Summary: Currently, there are inconsistent rules about the availability of persistent storage in third-party iframes across different types of storage (such as caches, IndexedDB, localstorage, sessionstorage, and cookies). We are looking to unify these behaviors into a consistent set of rules f