On 13/03/2019 01:46, flor...@rivoal.net wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 13, 2019 at 8:36:17 AM UTC+9, Emilio Cobos Álvarez wrote:
>> On 13/03/2019 00:22, Florian Rivoal wrote:
>>> Given that this is not merely setting a limit because you find that
>>> implementation more convenient, but actually a ca
On Wednesday, March 13, 2019 at 8:36:17 AM UTC+9, Emilio Cobos Álvarez wrote:
> On 13/03/2019 00:22, Florian Rivoal wrote:
> > Given that this is not merely setting a limit because you find that
> > implementation more convenient, but actually a case of considering it
> > desirable to ignore larg
On 13/03/2019 00:22, flor...@rivoal.net wrote:
> Given that this is not merely setting a limit because you find that
> implementation more convenient, but actually a case of considering it
> desirable to ignore large cursors in certain cases (and for security reasons
> even), I wonder if this is
Given that this is not merely setting a limit because you find that
implementation more convenient, but actually a case of considering it desirable
to ignore large cursors in certain cases (and for security reasons even), I
wonder if this is something that we should consider including in the
sp
Hi, just some email I forgot to send a while ago.
Summary: Block cursor images larger than 32 pixels wide that intersect
the Browser UI, by falling back to the default cursor (as if no cursor
image could be loaded).
This prevents malware sites from hijacking the cursor and look as if the
cursor w
5 matches
Mail list logo
