Re: Intent to Implement/Ship: -webkit-text-stroke

2016-04-14 Thread Daniel Holbert
On 04/14/2016 02:40 AM, Ms2ger wrote: >> Preference behind which this will be implemented: >> layout.css.prefixes.webkit > > Should this have a more specific pref? Absent a compelling reason, no -- it should not. We're using layout.css.prefixes.webkit here because, without this -webkit-text-stro

Re: Intent to Implement/Ship: -webkit-text-stroke

2016-04-14 Thread Xidorn Quan
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 7:40 PM, Ms2ger wrote: > On 14/04/16 09:26, Jeremy Chen wrote: > > *Summary*: We don't currently support -webkit-text-stroke; however, it > has > > been available for years in webkit based browsers and has seen widespread > > usage on the web. This css property is current

Re: Intent to Implement/Ship: -webkit-text-stroke

2016-04-14 Thread Ms2ger
On 14/04/16 09:26, Jeremy Chen wrote: > *Summary*: We don't currently support -webkit-text-stroke; however, it has > been available for years in webkit based browsers and has seen widespread > usage on the web. This css property is currently available in Chrome and > Safari. How about Edge? Shou

Intent to Implement/Ship: -webkit-text-stroke

2016-04-14 Thread Jeremy Chen
*Summary*: We don't currently support -webkit-text-stroke; however, it has been available for years in webkit based browsers and has seen widespread usage on the web. This css property is currently available in Chrome and Safari. *Bug*: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1248708 *Link

Intent to Implement/Ship: -webkit-text-stroke

2016-04-14 Thread Jeremy Chen
*Summary*: We don't currently support -webkit-text-stroke; however, it has been available for years in webkit based browsers and has seen widespread usage on the web. This css property is currently available in Chrome and Safari. *Bug*: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1248708 *Link