On 1/14/16 6:27 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Whatever we do for while(true) we should reuse here. There's no
observable difference to the user. (And as stated this can already
happen with promises and mutation observers.)
I dunno what the situation is right now with mutation observers, but for
On 1/14/16 4:44 AM, David Rajchenbach-Teller wrote:
However, if we wish to pause a page with such a microtask loop to
display some UX, trigger a breakpoint or even to leave some CPU to other
pages in the same process, is there anything specific we need to do to
guarantee that no network/user inpu
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 10:44 AM, David Rajchenbach-Teller
wrote:
> I also think that this makes sense. Can we already start thinking about
> countermeasures, though?
Whatever we do for while(true) we should reuse here. There's no
observable difference to the user. (And as stated this can already
Well, if khuey ever got into splitting the event loop, we might be
able to make progress on other tasks, but as far as I can see, detect
and throw is probably the best option.
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 8:44 PM, David Rajchenbach-Teller
wrote:
> I also think that this makes sense. Can we already sta
I also think that this makes sense. Can we already start thinking about
countermeasures, though?
It looks to me that catching a long-running/infinite microtask loop is
much easier to detect and interrupt than a long-running sequential loop.
However, if we wish to pause a page with such a microtask
I think this makes sense.
On 2016-01-13 4:59 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
Please see https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/512
Right now this is in the "does anyone have an objection to the basic
idea?" stage. So if someone does, please speak up!
I've already noted a possible concern about abuse,
Sounds good to me as well. As long as it's very clearly defined that
this doesn't return to the event loop and so UI events, timers,
network events, etc MUST NOT be processed between the tasks under any
circumstances.
I.e. something like:
function spinner() {
window.enqueueMicrotask(spinner)
}
s
In principle, I don't see any reason not to do this.
- Kyle
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> Please see https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/512
>
> Right now this is in the "does anyone have an objection to the basic
> idea?" stage. So if someone does, please speak up!
Please see https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/512
Right now this is in the "does anyone have an objection to the basic
idea?" stage. So if someone does, please speak up!
I've already noted a possible concern about abuse, but Promise and
MutationObserver kinda allow that already; it just t
9 matches
Mail list logo
