Re: Content Vault Feasibility RFC

2015-02-03 Thread Deian Stefan
Hi all, We are still working on COWL on two fronts. First, I am currently drafting up the FPWD for COWL. Second, we also started thinking about COWL in the context of extensions, which I ma share some similarities with the proposed CV. A draft position paper of this is available [1], but we also

Re: Content Vault Feasibility RFC

2015-02-03 Thread Ben Livshits
Looking forward to hearing more from Deian! I wonder if Bobby means the COWL paper. Best. -Ben Sent from a mobile device On Feb 3, 2015, at 10:40, Bobby Holley mailto:bobbyhol...@gmail.com>> wrote: Looping in Deian, who was working (is working?) on something like this. On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at

Re: Content Vault Feasibility RFC

2015-02-03 Thread Bobby Holley
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Ben Livshits wrote: > Looking forward to hearing more from Deian! I wonder if Bobby means the > COWL paper. Best. > Yes. There was ongoing research after the COWL paper by the Stanford team. The last time I spoke with them about it was in August, so I don't know

Re: Content Vault Feasibility RFC

2015-02-03 Thread Ben Livshits
vier Yiptong Cc: dev-platform; Sid Stamm; Marcos Caceres; Ehsan Akhgari; Christoph Kerschbaumer; Ed Lee; Ben Livshits Subject: Re: Content Vault Feasibility RFC Hi Olivier, I agree with ekr and Richard. There has been a lot of research lately about how to do personalization in a privacy-pr

Re: Content Vault Feasibility RFC

2015-02-03 Thread Bobby Holley
Looping in Deian, who was working (is working?) on something like this. On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Monica Chew wrote: > Hi Olivier, > > I agree with ekr and Richard. There has been a lot of research lately about > how to do personalization in a privacy-preserving manner. > > Bloom Cookies:

Re: Content Vault Feasibility RFC

2015-02-03 Thread Monica Chew
Hi Olivier, I agree with ekr and Richard. There has been a lot of research lately about how to do personalization in a privacy-preserving manner. Bloom Cookies: Web Search Personalization without User Tracking, NDSS 2015 http://research.microsoft.com/pubs/238114/BloomCookies.pdf RePriv: Re-Imagi

Re: Content Vault Feasibility RFC

2015-02-03 Thread rbarnes
It would be helpful if you could comment more on the use cases here. It's not entirely clear to me what's motivating this proposal. In your message, the "Inline" use case seems to have been truncated, and the "Mobile Applications" use case seems perfectly well addressed by iframes. Let's focu

Re: Content Vault Feasibility RFC

2015-02-03 Thread Eric Rescorla
This kind of feature comes up frequently, but to the best of my knowledge (which I believe is fairly up to date) it is not known how to build a robust version of this. To generalize the problem a bit, we have two pieces of software running on the user's computer: A: A confined process running in

Content Vault Feasibility RFC

2015-02-03 Thread Olivier Yiptong
# The Content Vault The purpose of this document is to gather your comments about the feasibility of the idea of a Content Vault (CV). After gathering your comments, a more formal RFC will be drafted. I’d like to use your comments to colour the proposal, from a platform, security and privacy p