On Wednesday, August 29, 2012 11:35:52 AM UTC-4, Andrew Halberstadt wrote:
> On 08/29/2012 09:56 AM, Andrew Halberstadt wrote:
>
> > On 08/28/2012 02:17 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
>
> >> On Tuesday 2012-08-28 12:52 -0400, Andrew Halberstadt wrote:
>
> >> I also don't think we should go quite as s
On 08/29/2012 09:56 AM, Andrew Halberstadt wrote:
On 08/28/2012 02:17 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
On Tuesday 2012-08-28 12:52 -0400, Andrew Halberstadt wrote:
I also don't think we should go quite as small as 400x400 -- and we
want to come up with a common value with other browser vendors that
are
On 08/28/2012 02:17 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
On Tuesday 2012-08-28 12:52 -0400, Andrew Halberstadt wrote:
I also don't think we should go quite as small as 400x400 -- and we
want to come up with a common value with other browser vendors that
are also using reftest. We don't want to be running o
On Wednesday 2012-08-29 17:08 +1200, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 6:17 AM, L. David Baron wrote:
>
> > We don't want to be running our reftests at
> > a size smaller than the accepted max size for reftests at W3C.
> >
>
> What is the current required size for W3C reftests?
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 6:17 AM, L. David Baron wrote:
> We don't want to be running our reftests at
> a size smaller than the accepted max size for reftests at W3C.
>
What is the current required size for W3C reftests? I can't find any
documentation of that.
Rob
--
“You have heard that it was
On Tuesday 2012-08-28 11:17 -0700, L. David Baron wrote:
> On Tuesday 2012-08-28 12:52 -0400, Andrew Halberstadt wrote:
> > == The Problem ==
> >
> > Reftests currently assume a window size of 800x1000. This is not
> > possible on mobile devices, and using this resolution on tegras and
> > pandas
On Tuesday, August 28, 2012 2:36:16 PM UTC-4, halb...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 28, 2012 1:58:43 PM UTC-4, Benoit Girard wrote:
>
> > I've already done this work but we decided to just increase the
>
> >
>
> > resolution for our tegra board:
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > See https:
On Tuesday, August 28, 2012 1:58:43 PM UTC-4, Benoit Girard wrote:
> I've already done this work but we decided to just increase the
>
> resolution for our tegra board:
>
>
>
> See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66
>
> which includes an outdated patch that adds a screen(w,h)
On Tuesday 2012-08-28 12:52 -0400, Andrew Halberstadt wrote:
> == The Problem ==
>
> Reftests currently assume a window size of 800x1000. This is not
> possible on mobile devices, and using this resolution on tegras and
> pandas consumes too much memory and results in many timeouts and
> random-fa
I've already done this work but we decided to just increase the
resolution for our tegra board:
See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66
which includes an outdated patch that adds a screen(w,h) annotation to
each test and a patch to compute the required size per test.
On Tue, Aug 2
If the exact width/height could be found for each test then these could
be marked in a manifest (theoretically, not speaking to the existing
reftest manifest format per se). Then reftest could be modified to take
a (e.g.) --resoltuion 400x400 argument and the test runner passing over
any test
== The Problem ==
Reftests currently assume a window size of 800x1000. This is not
possible on mobile devices, and using this resolution on tegras and
pandas consumes too much memory and results in many timeouts and
random-failures.
Changing the resolution to something like 400x400 is very s
12 matches
Mail list logo
