On 3/2/14, 1:46 PM, Axel Hecht wrote:
Hi,
I've watched you guys thinking for an hour ;-)
Some comments from me.
Yes to moving build flows that generate assets into the tree.
Yes to having a way for developers to reproduce what automation does.
Yes to having jobs being executed more on demand t
Hi,
I've watched you guys thinking for an hour ;-)
Some comments from me.
Yes to moving build flows that generate assets into the tree.
Yes to having a way for developers to reproduce what automation does.
Yes to having jobs being executed more on demand than on push, and
having that have idem
On 2/28/14, 1:28 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 2/28/14 3:48 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
* A lot of us want to kill client.mk. Having automation not directly
calling it will allow us to finally do this.
This will make bisects a bit exciting, because the right command to run
to "do a toplevel build"
On 2/28/14 3:48 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
* A lot of us want to kill client.mk. Having automation not directly
calling it will allow us to finally do this.
This will make bisects a bit exciting, because the right command to run
to "do a toplevel build" will depend on the exact revision you have
(This is likely off-topic for many dev-platform readers. I was advised
to post here because RelEng monitors dev-platform and I don't like
cross-posting.)
The technical interaction between build automation and mozilla-central
has organically grown into something that's very difficult to maintai
5 matches
Mail list logo
