On Thursday, October 3, 2013 6:51:10 PM UTC+5:30, Bobby Holley wrote:
> You should call Javascript functions from JS. If your app is mostly C++,
>
> then you can use a JS-implemented XPCOM component to do the JS work. If
>
> your core logic is easily convertible to JS, then you should do that, an
On Thursday, September 19, 2013 10:06:30 AM UTC+5:30, vasuyad...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Hi
>
>
>
> We are facing problem with our Add-ons support for FireFox 24.Firefox is
> crashing. In earlier approach we was using 'JS_GetGlobalObject' to get global
> object from docShell.
> https://developer
On Monday, September 23, 2013 9:33:59 PM UTC+5:30, Bobby Holley wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 5:12 AM, wrote:
>
>
>
> > Thanks a lot Bobby.
>
> > My issue is solved after use of nsCxPusher for JSContext.
>
> > Could you suggest me some alternative approach to do the same?
>
> >
>
>
>
>
On Thursday, September 19, 2013 10:06:30 AM UTC+5:30, vasuyad...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Hi
>
>
>
> We are facing problem with our Add-ons support for FireFox 24.Firefox is
> crashing. In earlier approach we was using 'JS_GetGlobalObject' to get global
> object from docShell.
> https://developer
Hi
We are facing problem with our Add-ons support for FireFox 24.Firefox is
crashing. In earlier approach we was using 'JS_GetGlobalObject' to get global
object from docShell.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Projects/SpiderMonkey/JSAPI_reference/JS_GetGlobalObject?redirectloca
5 matches
Mail list logo