Re: Heads Up: /storage upgraded from version 1.0 to 2.0

2017-03-21 Thread rnewman
On Thursday, March 16, 2017 at 12:16:24 PM UTC-7, Benjamin Smedberg wrote: > users that reverted to an older version, staying on the release channel: > 2.19% Benjamin, two further questions, one of which I think you can answer, and one you probably can't: - As Dolske asked: what proportion down

Re: Heads Up: /storage upgraded from version 1.0 to 2.0

2017-03-10 Thread rnewman
> As an example of why "backup the db" is harder than it sounds, you would > need to backup the entire storage subsystem. Mossop suggested I chime in on this thread, but I think Ben has covered much of what I'd say! Some set of schema changes is safe or possible to downgrade: rearranging deckc