We've had this conversation several times in the last few years and I think
I've finally figured out why it has always felt subtly wrong.
Our share of users on older platforms is disproportionally high compared to
the market in general because of our decline in market share. People who
don't want
Congratulations! It's been a long road, but this is super-important feature
for the future of the web.
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Eric Faust wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just a quick note to say that ES6 Classes (
> https://hacks.mozilla.org/2015/07/es6-in-depth-classes/) are going to ride
> the
Thanks for spearheading this, Nick!
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 7:15 AM, Chris Mills wrote:
> Nice work Nick - some really good content here.
>
> I’ve spent a good chunk of today reading through and giving it a copy edit.
>
> Chris Mills
> Senior tech writer || Mozilla
> developer.mozilla.org || M
On 09/16/2014 02:34 PM, Asa Dotzler wrote:
> On 9/16/14, 12:45 PM, Steve Fink wrote:
>> GGC was enabled yesterday (2014-Sep-15) on b2g-inbound with bug 1020751.
>> It has not yet been merged into mozilla-central, but I expect it will be
>> soon. GGC is already on desktop Firefox, and in fact just s
Dan,
Congratulations on landing the jit-tests split! I'm glad to hear we're
getting a make check replacement too. We discussed it a bit in IRC and
the rough decision, at least between jorendorff and myself, was to
expand the scope of the replacement to run /all/ of SpiderMonkey's test
suites.
Ide
On 01/20/2014 12:53 PM, Cameron Kaiser wrote:
> On 1/17/14 1:24 PM, Terrence Cole wrote:
>> SpiderMonkey will no longer scan the stack for live roots; you must now
>> wrap all GC thing pointers that live on the stack across a GC in the
>> JS::Rooted template for SpiderMonkey
On 01/18/2014 07:08 AM, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
> On 1/17/2014 4:24 PM, Terrence Cole wrote:
>> Exact stack rooting is now enabled by default on desktop builds of
>> firefox.
> Does this mean that the moving GC is also enabled, or is that a later step?
No, moving GC is a
Exact stack rooting is now enabled by default on desktop builds of firefox.
What this Means
===
SpiderMonkey will no longer scan the stack for live roots; you must now
wrap all GC thing pointers that live on the stack across a GC in the
JS::Rooted template for SpiderMonkey to see them.
On 11/15/2013 05:37 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
> On 11/15/13, 12:26 PM, Terrence Cole wrote:
>> The problem this mess is solving, at least in the GC, is that gecko
>> needs to be able to inline barriers, UnmarkGray, and misc other stuff.
>> Whenever we accidentally out-of-l
On 11/15/2013 06:51 AM, Jason Orendorff wrote:
> On 11/14/13 11:43 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
>> * Why does lots of js/'s source code gravitate towards the "bad"
>> extreme for most of the metrics (code size, compiler time,
>> preprocessor size)?
>
> We use templates very heavily and we inline like
I've been using DXR (at least when it has been working) since 2011. One
thing I'd like to see should be simple to implement: typing a file name
into the search bar should find that file rather than nothing.
On 10/02/2013 12:33 PM, Erik Rose wrote:
> What features do you most use in MXR and DXR?
>
On 06/27/2013 04:33 AM, Till Schneidereit wrote:
> Thanks for bringing this up. I agree that we should do something about
> this, and if only for testing purposes. I would tend to favor
>
> g) Add a command line argument to set the stack quota to the lowest any of
> our platforms support.
>
> Tha
On 04/22/2013 12:12 PM, Jeff Muizelaar wrote:
> On 2013-04-22, at 2:15 PM, Bill McCloskey wrote:
>
>> I can't agree with you more, Justin. I think Boris is right that we should
>> make these decisions on a case-by-case basis. But in the case of these
>> workers, it seems clear that converting the
nd that we are also attacking the same problem
from the other direction and we'd very much like it if we could make our
work more helpful to you.
-Terrence
>
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Terrence Cole wrote:
>> On 04/21/2013 04:51 PM, Justin Lebar wrote:
>>> I th
On 04/21/2013 04:51 PM, Justin Lebar wrote:
> I think we should consider using much less JS in the parts of Gecko that are
> used in B2G. I'd like us to consider writing new modules in C++ where
> possible, and I'd like us to consider rewriting existing modules in C++.
>
> I'm only proposing a ch
15 matches
Mail list logo
