On 8/14/14, 5:02 AM, Neil wrote:
> Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
>
>> On 8/13/2014 3:34 AM, Philipp Kewisch wrote:
>>
>>> Does this also affect binary extensions in any way? I'd imagine that
>>> globally installed extensions would break signing if placed
>>> incorrectly.
>>
>> You cannot place anything
On 8/12/14, 8:46 PM, Cameron McCormack wrote:
> Ben Hearsum wrote:
>> Apple recently announced changes to how OS X applications must be
>> packaged and signed
>
> Does this also apply if you run .app/Contents/MacOS/firefox binary
> manually rather than opening the .app?
>
As best as I can tell, no.
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 8:21 PM, Nicholas Nethercote
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Stephen Pohl wrote:
>> We are now (finally) getting ready to turn on history swipe animations
>> (bug 860493). There have been two major changes since sending out the
>> email
n OSX (bug 673875).
If you have any questions, concerns or feedback, please let me know.
Thanks,
Stephen
Original Message
Subject: Increase in memory utilization on Mac OSX 10.7+ due to history
swipe animations
From: Stephen Pohl
To: dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
Date: 2/12/13
Hi,
This is a quick heads up that Mac OSX 10.7+ lion style scroll bars (bug
636564) have landed on mozilla-inbound with
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/0c513ba74137.
Once merged to mozilla-central expect them to appear in our nightlies.
If you have any feedback or run
Asa,
where does the magic 20 pages deep history number come from? Why not 1? Or 999?
Andreas
On Feb 12, 2013, at 9:40 PM, Asa Dotzler wrote:
On 2/12/2013 3:08 PM, Ed Morley wrote:
On 12 February 2013 22:11:12, Stephen Pohl wrote:
I wanted to give a heads up that we're in the proce
L. David Baron wrote:
On Tuesday 2013-02-12 18:40 -0800, Asa Dotzler wrote:
doing something horribly wrong with memory. This is simply a
memory-expensive feature and it's a feature we *must* land.
Why is it simply a memory-expensive feature? Why does it require
any additional memory overhead a
details around this:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=678392#c176
-Stephen
Original Message
Subject: Re: Increase in memory utilization on Mac OSX 10.7+ due to
history swipe animations
From: Robert O'Callahan
To: Stephen Pohl
Cc: dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
Da
in memory utilization on Mac OSX 10.7+ due to
history swipe animations
From: Jet Villegas
To: Stephen Pohl
Cc: dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
Date: 2/12/13 3:29 PM
Stephen:
We talked about extracting this snapshot from the GFx Layers. Have you explored
that possibility? Taking the screenca
Hi,
I wanted to give a heads up that we're in the process of finalizing the
patch for bug 678392 which will give us history swipe animations on Mac
OSX 10.7+. Since we will be taking snapshots of the 20 most-recently
visited pages, this will undoubtedly lead to an increase in memory
utilizati
You might want to have a look at the work going on in this bug:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=678392
Especially function HSA__takeSnapshot() in browser.js might be of interest.
-Stephen
falcon@gmail.com wrote:
On Windows platform PrintWindow is capturing only plugins window
11 matches
Mail list logo
