gle curated list of dependencies and
necessary versions.
Nick
> ___
> dev-platform mailing list
> dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
>
___
d
some more logging and diagnostics to understand the performance
you're seeing. (And I can't say anything about PCH support, sorry.) Let's
take the follow-up to a Github issue.
Thanks!
Nick
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
newsgroup for me to make this post.
>
This is more appropriate for dev-platform, so I've CCed it there, and moved
dev-builds to the BCC list. In general you may get more help with these
types of questions asking in #developers on Matrix:
https://chat.mozilla.org/#/room/#developers:mozilla.o
On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 1:53 AM, David Teller wrote:
> I wanted to add something like that to about:performance, but at the
> time, my impression was that we did not have sufficient platform data on
> where allocations come from to provide something convincing.
>
The SpiderMonkey Debugger API ha
We have https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1243091 on file for
automatic leak detection in the DevTools' memory panel.
I'd have liked to try implementing
http://www.cs.utexas.edu/ftp/techreports/tr06-07.pdf because it can see
through frameworks/libraries (or claims to in a convincing way
Does `mach try` still require `git cinnabar` when using a `git` checkout of
m-c, or does it work with `moz-git-tools` now too?
Thanks,
Nick
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
> The Try Service ("Try") is a mechanism that allows developers to schedule
> tas
!
Thanks to everyone involved in getting this patch series landed!
Nick
[0]
https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=mozilla-inbound&revision=a8ae266cd61eb004d4f74a989e4d9c6d2ceb5b93
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
h
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Tom Tromey wrote:
> > "Boris" == Boris Zbarsky writes:
>
> >> https://github.com/source-map/source-map-rfc
>
> Boris> Are there any plans to have a standard here?
>
> All I found was this:
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mozilla.dev.js-
> sourcemap
Error().stack is not affected by source maps (nor should it be IMO). This
is just devtools facing with nothing that is web observable.
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 9:06 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 5/17/17 11:01 AM, Tom Tromey wrote:
>
>> In this case I think this does not apply, because as far as I
Updates have been re-enabled for Nightly.
On 17 May 2017 at 07:00, Mihai Tabara wrote:
> Updates to nightly are yet again available, pointing to last good
> build we know and agreed on channel meeting, which is the Sunday one
> (20170514).
> Thanks.
>
> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 3:02 PM, Mihai
I can review the DWARF related bits in a pinch, too.
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 2:04 PM, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 12:41:07PM -0800, Jim Blandy wrote:
> > Under the circumstances, I'll volunteer to review, if that's feasible.
>
> I can too.
>
> > On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 12:37 PM, T
FWIW, you can also avoid the
check-for-error-and-early-return-or-else-unwrap dance that is being
"hidden" within MOZ_TRY by using `mozilla::Result::andThen` (and
`mozilla::Result::map`) which are on inbound and will be on m-c soon.
The patch in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1324829
Thanks for getting this landed! Hooray for better error handling! \o/
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 5:46 AM, Jan de Mooij wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A few weeks ago we added mozilla::Result to MFBT [0][1]. I was asked
> to inform dev-platform about this, so here's a quick overview.
> mozilla::Result is base
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 1:19 AM, David Teller wrote:
>
> * CommonJS
>
Just a heads up: the devtools have been using CommonJS modules and lazily
requiring modules for a couple years now. If you don't want to jump
directly to ES modules, reusing our infrastructure is probably a good idea.
We also
Thanks Kan-Ru! I've personally tried to include the header with the wrong
case multiple times, so I appreciate this change a lot.
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Kan-Ru Chen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In Bug 1297276 I landed a patch to rename mozilla/unused.h to
> mozilla/Unused.h to make it more cons
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 4:39 PM, R Kent James wrote:
> On 8/21/2016 9:14 PM, Nicholas Nethercote wrote:
> > I strongly encourage people to do likewise on
> > any IDL files with which they are familiar. Adding appropriate checks
> isn't
> > always easy
>
> Exactly, and I hope that you and others r
Ok, I've filed this bug to use @@toStringTag in the debugger instead of
Debugger.Object.prototype.class:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1278310
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 6/6/16 12:23 PM, Nick Fitzgerald wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 8:21 PM, Nick Fitzgerald
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
>>
>> > Devtools bug: none so far, but maybe we need one? Does devtools rely on
>> > the JSClass name or Object.prototype.toString anywhere
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> Devtools bug: none so far, but maybe we need one? Does devtools rely on
> the JSClass name or Object.prototype.toString anywhere?
>
I think we are fine. There are certainly places where we use the
`Object.prototype.toString.call(thing) ===
We could create a MoveGuard, similar to ReentrancyGuard, that sets a `moved
= true` flag in debug builds and make methods assert against that.
(But it isn't nearly as nice as having borrowck...)
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 5:53 PM, smaug wrote:
> On 04/28/2016 08:00 AM, Gerald Squelart wrote:
>
> B
uses this?
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Nick Fitzgerald > wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone!
>>
>> Friendly PSA: sometimes you're debugging a "leak" where the GC considers
>> something reachable and therefore won't collect it, and this happen
Hi everyone!
Friendly PSA: sometimes you're debugging a "leak" where the GC considers
something reachable and therefore won't collect it, and this happens at an
inopportune time for using the devtools memory panel (eg right before a
DESTROY_RUNTIME collection), so you can't use the nice GUI for vi
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 3:24 AM, Nicholas Nethercote wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 7:38 PM, Nicolas Silva
> wrote:
> > Fallible construction (even with a way to report failure) is annoying if
> > only because the object's destructor has to account for the possible
> > invalid states. I much p
Is there a reason why we aren't using LTO?
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 4:35 PM, Ted Mielczarek wrote:
> No. GCC *has* an LTO optimizer, but we're not using it. We're just doing
> a PGO build. MSVC requires enabling LTO to use their PGO, so the
> resulting build has both.
>
> -Ted
>
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Birunthan Mohanathas <
birunt...@mohanathas.com> wrote:
> On 8 April 2016 at 18:10, Kartikaya Gupta wrote:
> > Others?
>
> enum class OptionD {
> SentenceCaseValues,
> ThisWontBeConfusedWithOtherThings
> // ... because you need to use OptionD::ThisWontBeConfu
Any reason not to adopt SpiderMonkey's check_spidermonkey_style.py? It
deals almost exclusively with header and include related things, and not
indent levels, line lengths, or other things that gecko style disagrees
with.
https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/config/check_spidermonkey_sty
h problems ?
---The original text of my problem
---
Message: 5
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 10:30:54 +0800 (CST)
From: Nick
To: dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
Subject: Porting Firefox OS 2.5 to my phone with libxul.so error.
I want to port Firefox OS 2.5 to my phone which support android system. And
I've done the following things:
1. Get the Firefox OS 2.5 code from git and config the nexus-5-l branch.
2. Replace the kernel with the prebuilt one from my android kernel source code.
3. Modify a little in init.rc ( which
It seems like try/tbpl could automatically detect new test files and run
them N times. That way, the developer doesn't have to do it manually, so it
is less "intimidating" and also less likely to be skipped by accident or
forgotten.
Running under rr would be nice, but even without rr this seems li
On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 5:41 AM, Philip Chee wrote:
> This is great! Is there a way of expanding/collapsing the whole tree?
> Thunderbird uses "\" (collapse) and "*" (expand).
>
You can use ALT+click on an arrow to expand a whole subtree. However,
because after a certain depth we start increme
Reply inline below.
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Jared Wein wrote:
> From your screenshot, there are a lot of instances of "objects > Array",
> "objects > Object", etc. Is the a way to display the variable name used for
> those objects?
>
The node might not be in a JS variable (eg is a C+
ools/Browser_Toolbox
Please try it out, give me your feedback, and file bugs in the "Firefox"
product and "Developer Tools: Memory" component!
My thanks to the folks who reviewed patches for this feature: Jordan
Santell, Steve Fink, Boris Zbarsky, and Jim Blandy.
Cheers,
N
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 11:07 AM, David Rajchenbach-Teller <
dtel...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> That sounds very useful.
>
> Any chance we can get the same kind of output on the console in case of
> mochitest memory leak?
>
I've filed https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1221704 to track
thi
r toolbox:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Tools/Browser_Toolbox
Please try it out and file bugs in the "Firefox" product and "Developer
Tools: Memory" component! We want this to be a useful tool for _you_!
Thanks,
Nick
[0]
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/moz
shown in a new tab. This is part of a wider problem with the
Content-Type header not being set (bug 1216804).
On 21/10/15 1:37 am, Nick Thomas wrote:
> Starting today at 1pm a subset of directories will be migrated
> from the FTP server to S3 - firefox, mobile, thunderbird, and
> calen
a for a few days, notably in
firefox/nightly
firefox/tinderbox-builds
firefox/try-builds
These will disappear as data is synced up to S3.
Cheers
Nick Thomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJWJ1vyAAoJ
be
emptied. README files with alternative options will be provided
Please contact the sheriff, or #releng, if you want to bring any issues
to our attention. bug 1211732 is tracking bug.
Nick Thomas (Release Engineering)
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev
Note that for JS objects (and JS strings very soon), you can track
allocation stacks with the Debugger API:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Tools/Debugger-API/Debugger.Memory
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Andrew McCreight
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 7:42 AM, Andrew McCreight
(Posted this reply to the wrong thread, reposting to the right one... >_<)
One more group of defectors within Mozilla. From the DevTools coding
standards[0]:
"""
- aArguments aAre the aDevil (don't use them please)
"""
Although, there are still some files in tree with the legacy style.
[0]
One more group of defectors within Mozilla. From the DevTools coding
standards[0]:
"""
- aArguments aAre the aDevil (don't use them please)
"""
Although, there are still some files in tree with the legacy style.
[0] https://wiki.mozilla.org/DevTools/CodingStandards#Code_style
On Tue, Jul 7
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Mike Hommey wrote:
> >
> > BTW, wasn't there an effort a few couple years ago, to move content
> > event loop in different threads for different tabs? What happened to
> > that?
> >
>
> If you are referring t
From your blog post:
> Heavy activity in background tabs badly affects desktop Firefox’s
scrolling performance1 (much worse than other browsers — we need E10S)
I was under the impression that because e10s is only a single process for
all content (at least right now) a background tab can still neg
Looking forward to eventually getting better JS searching via the
multi-language support!
What is the relative priority of permalinks to specific revisions?
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Erik Rose wrote:
> DXR 2.0 is about to land! This is a major revision touching every part of
> the system
This is built on top of the docshell ProfileTimelineMarkers. There is a
marker for the start of the traced operation and another for the end of the
traced operation.
The RAII class mozilla::AutoTimelineMarker simply adds these start and end
markers on construction and destruction respectively (but
instrumentation right off the bat!
Please take a look at the blockers of our meta bug, and file new bugs that
block it: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1145271
Thanks,
Nick (and the whole DevTools team)
"""
___
dev-platfor
he bat!
Please take a look at the blockers of our meta bug, and file new bugs that
block it: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1145271
Thanks,
Nick (and the whole DevTools team
)
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mo
ry listings, an API to lookup files would
>be
>
> The above are all required but my input on them would skew the results as
> I don't actively develop those tools.
>
> Kevin
>
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 1:29 AM, Nick Thomas wrote:
>
>> ftp.mozilla
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Bobby Holley wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Nick Fitzgerald
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> And this can surely be done via private channels, without public
>> shaming and the potential negatives people have listed elsewhere in
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Bobby Holley wrote:
> It's not about making mistakes - it's about being mis-calibrated with
> respect to the rest of the development community. And it's not about
> shaming - it's about making people (both the developer and others) aware of
> these mismatches so t
relying on, so please complete this survey to
let us know:
http://bit.ly/1K0Ix0a
Thanks,
Nick Thomas
(Mozilla Release Engineering)
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Yes they are built on the same SPS profiler backend.
However, the gecko profiler addon will do things the builtin devtools
can't, like open a shell and call `atos` to symbolicate C++ function
addresses.
See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1132529 for some context.
For the time being
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Andrew Halberstadt <
ahalberst...@mozilla.com> wrote:
>
> For example, we may implement a way to run all tests with a given tag
> across multiple different suites.
>
>
Does this mean that I can't do `./mach test --tag foobar` to run both
xpcshell and mochitests
I recommend reading
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Tools/Debugger-API or
js/src/doc/Debugger/ for more information.
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Nick Fitzgerald
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Joshua Cranmer [image: 🐧] <
> pidgeo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Joshua Cranmer 🐧
wrote:
> Getting good code coverage (line and branch coverage) ultimately requires
> fine-grained instrumentation (ideally bytecode-level) not presented by the
> current Debugger.
>
I think you can get fine-grained enough data with the existi
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Nick Fitzgerald > wrote:
>
>> For those of us using Emacs:
>>
>> I use M-x shell as my terminal, and when combined with
>> compilation-shell-minor-mode, I get the followin
l for me but it's also kinda gross [1] and this
> seems like a problem that everybody else working on C++ code has to
> deal with as well. So I'm wondering if there are other, better ways of
> doing it, and if so, could they be made automatic? There is |mach
> warnings-list| which i
x27;t use the flag
(because that imposes on everyone), and if you want them for your
development, you should still be able to use them, but in a way that
doesn't force those who don't want them to do so.
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 7:05 PM, Jim Blandy wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 2:22
I generally don't find them useful, but instead annoying, and that they
provide a lot of noise to filter out to find actual relevant errors. This
is including the undefined property errors. It is a common JS style to pass
around configuration/option objects that will be missing many properties
that
ier to entry and especially to
upgrading older devices.
Nick
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Filed https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1085767
-Nick
On 21/10/14 7:34 am, Stefan Sitter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> are there plans to switch the Thunderbird builders from VS2010 to VS2013
> as well?
>
> /Stefan
___
dev-platfor
# Summary
By appending "//# sourceURL=foo.js" to script text that is being passed
to `eval`, `new Function`, or as the text content of a dynamically
appended
z.build hoops I need to jump through to use
protobufs from within toolkit/devtools?
Thanks,
Nick
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
On 8/25/14, 8:37 AM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
How fast do "no-op" / light builds need to be for |mach build
| to not exist?
About 10 seconds to compete with my usage[0] of |./mach build
| for hacking on devtools.
Of course, getting even faster is always appreciated ;)
[0] Actual command I ru
oplay, reducing user control yet further?
Can you be explicit about the three states of this proposed tri-state pref?
Nick
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
or being a "power user", and likely one who cares about restore
responsiveness.
Nick
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
On 6/25/14, 8:15 AM, Jason Orendorff wrote:
We're considering building a JavaScript API for dynamic analysis of JS
code.
Here's the sort of thing you could do with it:
- Gather code coverage information (useful for testing/release mgmt?)
- Trace all object mutation and method calls (useful
On 6/27/14, 8:49 AM, Jason Orendorff wrote:
On 06/26/2014 06:59 AM, David Rajchenbach-Teller wrote:
I would be interested in adding boundary checks and invariant checks
that could be eliminated in opt builds. Is this in the scope of your
project?
No, I don't think so. S2S could certainly do i
On 6/25/14, 1:06 PM, Jason Orendorff wrote:
An alternative involves letting you modify JS code just before it's
compiled (source-to-source transformation). This is more general (you
could modify the instrumented code arbitrarily, and react
synchronously as it executes) but maybe that's undesira
sed to a static recording)
debugging with live, on-stack code editing) that I hesitate to even get
my hopes up...
Nick
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
On 6/3/14, 11:34 PM, Byron Jones wrote:
thanks to dylan's work on bug 489028, bugzilla now tracks when you
view a bug, allowing you to search for bugs which have been updated
since you last visited them.
see my blog post for more details: http://wp.me/p1JUqW-9M
You might check out http://bu
g
mathematical properties into the type hierarchy directly caused more
problems than it solved. I'd like to avoid properties encoded as
instance types if we possibly can. (Exposing isIdentity as an internal
instanceof is fine.)
Nick
[1] http://sagemath.org/
sion (directly) to the Web. It would be great to see these
divisions used internally to optimize: composing translations gives
another translation, etc.
Nick
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
On 2014-06-02, 9:59 AM, Rik Cabanier wrote:
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Nick Alexander mailto:nalexan...@mozilla.com>> wrote:
On 2014-06-02, 4:59 AM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Rik Cabanier mailto:caban...@gmail.
s derived from some underlying transformation, or are they
given as a list of coefficients?
If the latter, the isIdentity flag needs to be determined by the
constructor, or fed as a parameter. Exactly how does the constructor
determine the parameter? Exactly how does the user?
Nick
__
On 5/7/14, 4:21 PM, Gavin Sharp wrote:
What does "get rid of strict warnings as errors for xpcshell tests"
mean in practice?
It means that our non-standard spidermonkey "strict mode" (not the
actual strict mode) console warnings would continue to simply be console
warning messages rather than
On 5/6/14, 5:31 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
Are these warnings ever useful enough that this is worth it?
Personally, I think not. Bill seemed to really like them. *shrug*
This was why I thought it might be easier to just make it optional.
___
dev-platfo
On 5/6/14, 3:29 PM, Bill McCloskey wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Peterson"
To: dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2014 3:11:40 PM
Subject: Re: Disabling strict warnings as errors in xpcshell
btw, I believe the JS team now uses the term "extra warnings" to
d
t. As Eddy said,
strict warning free code is not a goal for devtools, it is just
something we are forced to do instead of work on whatever we are
actually trying to do!
Nick
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
On 4/24/14, 1:51 AM, Nicholas Nethercote wrote:
There are
still 16 compartments whose name includes "devtools", for example.
Filed https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001131 for lazily
loading devtools modules where it makes sense.
___
dev
1. Check in the LibOVR sources as-is, in other-licenses/oculus. Add a
configure flag, maybe --disable-non-free, that disables building it.
Build and ship it as normal in our builds.
Should be opt-in, not opt-out.
+1
Nick
___
dev-platform mailing
me some license reading and explain what the existing
framework around shipping libovr is? Is it explicitly allowed?
Explicitly dis-allowed? If I read gerv's post [1] correctly, it is
allowed, but it's hard to distinguish gerv's opinion from Mozilla legal's.
Nick
[1] http
On 3/10/14 4:24 AM, Jan Honza Odvarko wrote:
> Debugger.script.source.displayURL isn't available for new Function scripts
> that contain the //# sourceURL directive when accessing it within
> Debugger.onNewScript hook.
>
> It's properly set when testing the flag after timeout.
>
> Note that it's
This was before that bug.
See ComputeStackString:
http://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/js/src/jsexn.cpp?from=jsexn.cpp#206
The format is:
[] @ : :
The last : and is what was added in that bug.
I guess the port-or-line-number question is unambiguous if there is
*always* a line num
On 2014-03-02, 9:12 AM, Ted Mielczarek wrote:
On 3/2/2014 5:25 AM, Neil wrote:
I've noticed seven moz.build files containing tabs, I assume this is
undesirable?
Yes. We should probably make the moz.build reader error on tabs.
+1, and filed Bug 978582 [1].
Nick
[1]
larly interested in
packaging, I inspect and rebuild omni.ja with a whole bunch of different
tools.
Nick
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
would trim the mobile/android APK size.
Nick
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
really meta-data, and I think it will diverge so fast
that it's not worth trying.
Nick
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
have style issues. I use emacs at
the same time, especially when touching up rebases [2].
Fennec is almost all text editors. We have an open ticket to support
IDEs [3], but there are a lot of things working against us.
Nick
[1] This merge process is essentially manual and is similar to the
On 1/7/14 11:23 AM, Neil wrote:
> Martin Thomson wrote:
>
>> in JS, a case that I’ve encountered several times:
>> _classMethodName: function
>> ReasonableClassName__classMethodName(argument1, argument2) {
>>
> I thought that our debugging story had improved sufficiently that we
> didn't
atically
behind the scenes when I restart the browser, it is in my face and makes
upgrading a chore that I have to take care of.
Is there a bug tracking this regression?
Nick
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozil
and mxrf keywords for searching in files; if mxrf jumped to the
unique result, I would be irritated (because I often just want to see
what the full path to the file is, like `git ls-files | grep`).
Nick
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
s the
interactive REPL.
Best,
Nick
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
So I'd like to ask, if you care about this,
which way would _you_ have as the default?
I want |mach run| to start the application in the foreground.
Nick
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/lis
that remote testing commands can guess MOZ_HOST_BIN
candidates.
Nick
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
re source-tree specific: build logs,
compiler warnings, test results. I would not want to share too much
state between my mozilla-inbound, mozilla-central, and services-central
trees.
I think making this distinction explicit will help: ~/.mozbuild and
$
adding browser/devtools/* to the dependency list prompts us
developers to externalize our knowledge of the dependencies not captured
by the current build system, which seems like an artifact we will
appreciate in the future.
Nick
___
dev-platform mailing li
On 13-05-03 12:13 PM, Neil wrote:
Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 2013-05-02 7:23 PM, Dave Townsend wrote:
On 5/2/2013 3:45 PM, Nick Alexander wrote:
On 13-05-02 3:09 PM, Josh Matthews wrote:
According to
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/build/dumbmake-dependencies#8,
it is
On 13-05-02 4:23 PM, Dave Townsend wrote:
On 5/2/2013 3:45 PM, Nick Alexander wrote:
On 13-05-02 3:09 PM, Josh Matthews wrote:
According to
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/build/dumbmake-dependencies#8,
it is equivalent to the following:
./mach build -X chrome xpcom toolkit
o
make -f client.mk chrome
make -f client.mk xpcom
make -f client.mk toolkit/library
Nick
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
ho added significant functionality
and provided valuable guidance on how to integrate some of these ideas
into mach.
Yours,
Nick Alexander
[1] http://hg.mozilla.org/users/josh_joshmatthews.net/smartmake
[2] smartmake can also maintain timestamps and deduce what directories
need to be built, but this
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
