Hi Olivier,
I agree with ekr and Richard. There has been a lot of research lately about
how to do personalization in a privacy-preserving manner.
Bloom Cookies: Web Search Personalization without User Tracking, NDSS 2015
http://research.microsoft.com/pubs/238114/BloomCookies.pdf
RePriv: Re-Imagi
- Original Message -
> Hey folks,
>
> We already have the protobuf library in the tree, and it seems to be
> used for layer scope and webrtc.
>
> I'd like to use it for serializing heap snapshots in devtools code, but
> I have a couple questions:
>
> * How do I integrate the compilation
Thanks, Ryan!
Can this be moved to
https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/mozilla/libraries/win32/MozillaBuildSetup-Latest.exe,
which is currently pointed at 1.8? I was accidentally using the old version
before bsmith told me I could save a lot of time by upgrading. It did save a
lot of time,
Ugh, you're right :( I had originally tested in a class-less function. Within
class declarations "using" is only good for things in the base class.
http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/using_declaration
- Original Message -
> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 9:03 AM,
This compiles using g++ for me.
namespace foo {
namespace bar {
class baz;
}
}
using foo::bar::baz;
class nsSVGUtils
{
public:
static baz GetFillRule(baz* aElement);
};
int main(void) {
return 0;
}
- Original Message -
> On 10/31/13 3:05 PM, Monica Chew wrote:
> > Can we
Can we agree on using the using directive instead of typedefs when it comes to
namespaces? I think it's less likely to lead to confusing compile errors than
typedefs.
class nsSVGUtils
{
using mozilla::gfx::FillRule;
using mozilla::dom::Element;
public:
static FillRule GetFillRule(Eleme
> We would also like to be able to run A/B experiments.
I would like to see this in the form of percent experiments controlled by
prefs, which are pseudo-randomly set on update. This would mean that telemetry
would need to include dumps of relevant prefs. It would also make it easier to
set def
7 matches
Mail list logo
