I haven't heard any negative comments, so it's time to go ahead and make
this change.
mitchell
On 8/3/16 10:20 PM, Mitchell Baker wrote:
Over time we've made a series of exceptions to the level 3 requirements
for Sheriffs and this proposal addresses that.
The current Policy
Over time we've made a series of exceptions to the level 3 requirements
for Sheriffs and this proposal addresses that.
The current Policy for level 3 is:
Level 3 - Core Product Access
Requirements: two vouchers - module owners or peers of code stored at
this level
The iss
ideal followup is governance ... cross posting to reach those likely to
be interested
I'm currently the owner of the Commit Access Policy module. That's
because I wrote the original policy and did what was necessary to get it
implemented. (That's old history!) I was also engaged in the rewr
This is a long-ish message. It covers general topics about Thunderbird
and the future, and also the topics of the Foundation involvement (point
9) and the question of merging repositories (point 11). Naturally, I
believe it’s worth the time to read through the end.
1. Firefox and Thunderbird
I'm in the middle of a hectic business trip, so will write more while
i"m on the plane home tonight.
The first thing to figure out, as Doug said, is how much support the
project should provide Thunderbird. 5 minutes might be an obvious yes,
as noted earlier. At some level the answer is an ob
Yes, this is a good topic and I agree i'm a necessary party here.
Is there some way of getting a good sense of the work that we're talking
about?
mitchell
On 10/23/15 6:15 PM, Doug Turner wrote:
Thunderbird is under supported and potentially harmful (as Brian Smith pointed
out on the mozilla
6 matches
Mail list logo
