An update to this: I just re-joined the ARIA-WG on Mozilla's behalf.
Marco
2016-06-02 17:47 GMT+02:00 David Bolter :
> Hi Johnathan,
>
> Our lack of direct W3C ARIA involvement recently is mainly due to
> time/resource constraints and we have influence via proxy.
>
> I think ARIA is best scoped
Hi everyone,
On 07.01.2015 12:19, I wrote:
> Besides: It does give us a competitive advantage over other browsers in
> the academic space and whereever other space longdesc may be used, or
> start being used once it is officially sanctioned by the W3C.
To reiterate: In certain areas like education
>> proposal that we do support.
> Maybe Marco Zehe would be interested in removing it :-).
I actually am not. ;) The reason is not that I care about this feature.
I honestly don't. But the noise that is to be expected from "interested
parties" if we remove the feature is
For reference -- if this is applicable --, these failures are tracked in
bug 1014673: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1014673
Marco
On 23.05.2014 09:10, Marco Zehe wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> for a couple of days on Nightly, I am seeing an increasing number of
> WM_GETOB
Hi all,
for a couple of days on Nightly, I am seeing an increasing number of
WM_GETOBJECT message response failures, causing in intermittent
accessibility failures. I know for a fact that nothing in our code
changed recently that could cause this, so I was wondering if OMTC could
be responsible?
5 matches
Mail list logo