Re: Intent to ship: Web Speech API

2019-10-12 Thread Fabrice Desre
Hi André :) The links to the last 3 docs seem to not be publicly accessible: - Are you adding voice commands to Firefox? -> mana is not public. What’s next? -> private google doc. Have a question not addressed here? -> private slack channel. On 10/12/19 3:14 PM, Andre Natal wrote: > The d

Re: Intent to unship: navigator.registerContentHandler()

2018-01-09 Thread Fabrice Desre
On 01/09/2018 04:59 PM, Jonathan Kingston wrote: I would like to see the expansion of this feature here, especially for handling more types of content. Chrome has been working on Web Share Target API[1] which somewhat overlaps this behaviour and could be expanded to cope with the use cases here.

Re: Device Memory header and JS API

2017-09-07 Thread Fabrice Desre
On 09/07/2017 11:09 AM, Shubhie Panicker via dev-platform wrote: Thanks for the comments. << The low end is extremely small buckets, and the high end isn't even fleshed out but I'm certain that's becomes small buckets too >16GB too. << (Obviously this doesn't take into account mobile, and I coul

Re: Changing .idl files

2017-08-07 Thread Fabrice Desre
On 08/07/2017 08:17 PM, Kris Maglione wrote: Yes, that means that some users and developers will continue to use them, and continue to get upset when they break, but that's what they're signing up for when they flip the preference. I tend to compare this to the rooted Android ecosystem. People

Re: Announcing MozillaBuild 3.0 Release

2017-07-24 Thread Fabrice Desre
On 07/24/2017 05:20 PM, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote: When I'm done w/ that, I'll start w/ things I've been planning for quite some time, eg. moving mailbox handling to external upas service, all credential related stuff to factotum, move contact handling to external programs, etc, et

Re: WoT Gateway Implementation

2016-12-15 Thread Fabrice Desre
On 12/15/2016 03:57 AM, Benjamin Francis wrote: Reasons for using Node for WoT APIs: - NodeJS is now a very popular language for server side web development and has a huge existing community and collection of modules to draw from. Using NodeJS will help attract community contribution

Re: Removal of B2G from mozilla-central

2016-10-04 Thread Fabrice Desre
On 10/04/2016 08:34 AM, Axel Hecht wrote: I'd favor to remove at least anything related to l10n from b2g. It never really worked, and is a half-maintained copy of the almost-working stuff in mobile. In my local branches that try to create a test on broken l10n infrastructure, both mobile and b2

Re: Removal of B2G from mozilla-central

2016-10-03 Thread Fabrice Desre
On 10/03/2016 04:22 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote: https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/search?q=gonk seems to contradict your assertion that gonk is well-contained. There are literally references to gonk throughout the tree. Every reference that isn't self-contained introduces cognitive dissonance