One clarification. Sites that use WebRTC but only do H264 do exist -
http://web.projectsquared.com/ is one of them. When you try to initiate a
video call using Chrome it has a popup that says "Firefox Rocks for Video
Calls!" and gives a "Download Firefox" button. It has mostly non-browser
endpo
show_bug.cgi?id=onelogger ?
>
> I feel like the goals there are orthogonal to NSPR vs iostream.
>
> I haven't had a chance to work on this lately, but I do intend to land
> something when I can.
>
> On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Ethan Hugg wrote:
> >>It is very usef
>It is very useful for building a logging interface that is safer and more
>convenient than NSPR's printf-style logging. Note that, again, Eric
>Rescorla already built an (partial) iostream-based wrapper around NSPR for
>WebRTC. I would say that, if there is no additional overhead, then we
>should
Hi All,
We currently have 10 C++ GTest unittests in Firefox in
media/mtransport/test and media/webrtc/signaling/test that build standalone
tests with the FF build. These tests currently run as part of the build
and make the B orange if they fail which is why a couple of them are still
stubbed at
4 matches
Mail list logo