Re: Intent to ship: stop dispatching "keypress" events when pressed key (key combination) does not introduce text input

On Thursday, November 29, 2018 at 5:22:47 PM UTC-8, masayuki nakano wrote: > Summary: We'll stop dispatching non-printable "keypress" events. > "non-printable" means that key press or key combination does not > introduce text input without IME. For example, arrow key press, Ctrl+A, > etc. > >

Re: Intent to ship: stop dispatching "keypress" events when pressed key (key combination) does not introduce text input

On Thursday, November 29, 2018 at 5:22:47 PM UTC-8, masayuki nakano wrote: > Summary: We'll stop dispatching non-printable "keypress" events. > "non-printable" means that key press or key combination does not > introduce text input without IME. For example, arrow key press, Ctrl+A, > etc. > >

Re: Intent to implement and ship: navigator.hardwareConcurrency

On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Joshua Cranmer 🐧 wrote: > And it also presumes that all of the CPUs are going to be more or less > available Please clarify what you are referring to by "more or less available". "more or less" makes me think you're referring to a fractional value, such as load.

Re: Intent to implement and ship: navigator.hardwareConcurrency

Gavin: The fingerprinting entropy exposed by Rik's patch is actual *magnitudes* less than the entropy exposed on http://renderingpipeline.com/webgl-extension-viewer/ I don't need the extra less-than-a-bit of entropy from my proposal to reliably fingerprint you, as the above URL + Panopticlick is a

Re: Intent to implement and ship: navigator.hardwareConcurrency

On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: > No, you're wrong. An available core is a core which your application can > use to run computations on. If another code is already keeping it busy > with a higher priority, it's unavailable by definition. > Run this code

Re: Intent to implement and ship: navigator.hardwareConcurrency

On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: > supporting a worker pool that actually scales to how many cores you have > available 1) What is an "available core" to you? An available core to me is a core that I can use to compute. A core under load (even 100% load) is still a core I ca

Re: Intent to implement and ship: navigator.hardwareConcurrency

On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: > Can you please provide some examples of actual web applications that do > this, and what they're exactly trying to do with the number once they > estimate one? (Eli's timing attack demos don't count. ;-) One example of a website in the wil