I have no idea if this is feasible but could we prevent extensions from
performing synchronous layout flushes before layout has started? If this is
possible, extensions that need to perform them could require a new permission?
Another alternative, can we prevent extensions from injecting content
On 16/07/15 21:26, Anthony Ricaud wrote:
Potch and I are working on a website to present Mozilla's point of view
on various web platform features. Other browsers have similar websites
[1] [2] [3]. This project has been in lingo for a while so, to get it
out the door, we're going to fo
On 17/07/15 16:46, James Graham wrote:
On 17/07/15 04:21, Eric Shepherd wrote:
Agreed. This is about how we feel about a spec, its content, and the
design of its API, not about if or when we will get around to
implementing it. That's also something worth capturing, but they're
not the same data
On 16/07/15 21:26, Anthony Ricaud wrote:
Potch and I are working on a website to present Mozilla's point of view
on various web platform features. Other browsers have similar websites
[1] [2] [3]. This project has been in lingo for a while so, to get it
out the door, we're going to fo
On 16/07/15 21:51, Martin Thomson wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Anthony Ricaud wrote:
In order to get accurate data and update it regularly, we need your help.
Please go to the following etherpad and insert any information that can help
us:
https://etherpad.mozilla.org/gecko-web
Potch and I are working on a website to present Mozilla's point of view
on various web platform features. Other browsers have similar websites
[1] [2] [3]. This project has been in lingo for a while so, to get it
out the door, we're going to focus on one information: what is Mozilla's
opinion o
I don't think we should implement this. Surely it provides a better user
experience but that's always the tradeoff when considering implementing
proprietary features from other vendors. If we changed our user-agent to
something that matches Android or iOS devices, we would get mobile
versions o
On 16/06/14 21:34, Jet Villegas wrote:
1. Let people use the icon fonts anywhere. (ie. like "MS WingDings" can be used
for this purpose)
2. The patch in bug 1008458 introduces "private" fonts that use the Unicode
Private Use Area (PUA) for icon glyphs.
3. Use PUA characters as per bug 1008458 b
On 17/04/14 01:22, Kyle Huey wrote:
I definitely recall attending a brownbag presentation from a
researcher who had built a record and replay scheme for JS at the
office in MV sometime in the last few years.
- Kyle
That would be https://air.mozilla.org/timelapse/ .
A short video: https://www.y
On 10/07/13 15:09, smaug wrote:
One thing, which has often brought up, would be to have other automatic
coding style checker than just Ms2ger.
At least in the DOM land we try to follow the coding style rules rather
strictly and it would ease reviewers work if
there was some good tool which does t
On 18/03/13 17:39, L. David Baron wrote:
On Monday 2013-03-18 09:27 -0700, Jason Smith wrote:
I'd actually like to see Core higher on the list for the
no-canconfirm case. I think it's common for reasonably
well-informed Web developers (who would have been able to choose a
reasonably correct comp
11 matches
Mail list logo
