[IMPORTANT] Submit your PI Requests for Firefox 68 QA feature testing by March 29

Similar to what QA did for previous Firefox feature testing prioritization , we would like to do the same for Fx68. In order to help with the process, *please submit your pi-request

Re: Intent to implement: cryptomining and fingerprinting resource blocking

On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 6:07 AM Ehsan Akhgari wrote: > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019, 9:39 PM Rik Cabanier, wrote: > >> Why are these sites not included in the "safe browsing" service that is >> used by most browsers? >> That way, everyone would be protected. >> > > Because the relevant part of safe brow

Re: Intent to implement: Limit the maximum life-time of cookies set through document.cookie to seven days

Hi Ehsan, Thanks for the follow up. I don't have access to a macOS computer with that 12.0.3 version of Safari On the other hand I have access to Google Analytics data for multiple sites, not the top 100 Alexa, but I don't see any evidence of a shift introduced by Safari 12.0.3 , for example th

Re: Intent to implement and ship: Gamepad Extensions `multi touch` and `light indicator`

On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 1:11 PM Tom Ritter wrote: > Okay, good, not making this data available until the user activity > engages with the gamepad/VR controller (mostly) assuages my concerns > on this component. My remaining concern is around the sensitivity of > axis movement. If I have my contro

Re: Intent to implement: Limit the maximum life-time of cookies set through document.cookie to seven days

On Tue, Mar 19, 2019, 6:15 PM , wrote: > Hi > > Sorry but I don't read the webkit.org blog post in the same way > https://webkit.org/blog/8613/intelligent-tracking-prevention-2-1/ > > "The **beta** releases of iOS 12.2 and Safari 12.1 on macOS High Sierra > and Mojave include an updated version o

Re: Intent to implement: cryptomining and fingerprinting resource blocking

On Thu, Mar 21, 2019, 9:39 PM Rik Cabanier, wrote: > Why are these sites not included in the "safe browsing" service that is > used by most browsers? > That way, everyone would be protected. > Because the relevant part of safe browsing service covers a different set of criteria: https://www.goog

Re: Intent-to-Ship: Backward-Compatibility FIDO U2F support for Google Accounts

Hi all, Some naive questions to understand what's happened here. Is https://fidoalliance.org/specs/fido-u2f-v1.0-nfc-bt-amendment-20150514/fido-u2f-javascript-api.html#high-level-javascript-api the API that will be added to Firefox? Is https://cs.chromium.org/chromium/src/chrome/browser/resource

Re: Building dav1d 0.2.1 - nasm error

On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 10:53:40AM +0100, Gabriele Svelto wrote: > Hi Gangadharan, > > On 22/03/19 05:25, gangadhara...@gmail.com wrote: > > I've been trying to build dav1d 0.2 but I always end with meson error > > > > Unusable script '/usr/bin/nasm' > > Program nasm found: NO > > > > meson.bui

Re: Building dav1d 0.2.1 - nasm error

Hi Gangadharan, On 22/03/19 05:25, gangadhara...@gmail.com wrote: > I've been trying to build dav1d 0.2 but I always end with meson error > > Unusable script '/usr/bin/nasm' > Program nasm found: NO > > meson.build:324:4: ERROR: Program(s) ['nasm'] not found or not executable > > Eventhough t