Re: Intent to ship: WebVR on macOS

2018-10-11 Thread kgilbert
On Tuesday, February 27, 2018 at 12:51:46 PM UTC-8, kear...@kearwood.com wrote: > On Wednesday, September 20, 2017 at 4:30:56 PM UTC-7, Kearwood Kip Gilbert > wrote: > > As of 2017-10-01, I intend to turn WebVR on by default for macOS. It has > > been developed behind the dom.vr.enabled prefer

Re: web-platform-tests that fail only in Firefox (from wpt.fyi data)

2018-10-11 Thread Boris Zbarsky
I filed https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1498357 to track these failures. -Boris ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Re: web-platform-tests that fail only in Firefox (from wpt.fyi data)

2018-10-11 Thread Boris Zbarsky
On 10/11/18 4:22 PM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: https://gist.github.com/foolip/a77c88e62aa3cfc461c2879f3e5d4855 is a list of tests that fail in Firefox Nightly, but pass in stable versions of Chrome, Edge and Safari. Or more precisely have some sub-test that has that property, right? Thank you f

web-platform-tests that fail only in Firefox (from wpt.fyi data)

2018-10-11 Thread Philip Jägenstedt
Hi all, I sent the result of some investigation to webkit-dev [1] today and thought you might be interested to take a look the equivalent list for Firefox. https://gist.github.com/foolip/a77c88e62aa3cfc461c2879f3e5d4855 is a list of tests that fail in Firefox Nightly, but pass in stable versions

Re: Intent to implement and ship: WebP image support

2018-10-11 Thread Jeff Muizelaar
Yes, that's part of it. Further, now that Edge has shipped it we can cause there to be a majority of vendors supporting it. Having WebP supported by all of the browsers changes the weight we put on the different advantages and disadvantages. For example, Firefox supporting WebP will allow now allow

Re: Intent to implement and ship: WebP image support

2018-10-11 Thread Randell Jesup
>Are we bringing in a new third party library for this? (Seems like yes?) libwebp (see https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1294490) >Who else uses it/audits it? Does anyone else fuzz it? Is it in OSS-fuzz? >Are we fuzzing it? http://developers.google.com/speed/webp - Chrome uses it. Th

Re: Intent to unship: LocalMediaStream

2018-10-11 Thread Mike Taylor
On 10/11/18 11:13 AM, Andreas Pehrson wrote: We don't have telemetry for this. On the other hand we're the last ones still implementing this, so that takes care of the people that don't test in Firefox that you mention. FWIW Chrome removed this in 47. That's three years ago. And Chrome tends

Re: Intent to unship: LocalMediaStream

2018-10-11 Thread Andreas Pehrson
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 4:58 PM Mike Taylor wrote: > On 10/11/18 9:16 AM, Andreas Pehrson wrote: > > I would like to unship the MediaStream subclass LocalMediaStream and its > > stop method. > > > > Firefox is the only major browser to still ship LocalMediaStream. It is > the > > type we use for

Re: Intent to implement and ship: WebP image support

2018-10-11 Thread Tom Ritter
Are we bringing in a new third party library for this? (Seems like yes?) Who else uses it/audits it? Does anyone else fuzz it? Is it in OSS-fuzz? Are we fuzzing it? How does upstream behave? Do they cut releases or do they just have continual development and downstreams grab random versions of it

Re: Intent to implement and ship: WebP image support

2018-10-11 Thread Boris Zbarsky
On 10/11/18 11:43 AM, Andrew Osmond wrote: We are facing a growing number of webcompat reports against our Gecko-derived Android offerings, where web developers assume Android and/or mobile implies support for WebP. In the past, I believe we objected to adding WebP for various reasons. Do we f

Intent to implement and ship: WebP image support

2018-10-11 Thread Andrew Osmond
WebP is an image format developed by Google, long supported by Chrome. We are facing a growing number of webcompat reports against our Gecko-derived Android offerings, where web developers assume Android and/or mobile implies support for WebP. In addition, Edge has now shipped WebP [1]. As such, I

Re: Intent to unship: LocalMediaStream

2018-10-11 Thread Mike Taylor
On 10/11/18 9:16 AM, Andreas Pehrson wrote: I would like to unship the MediaStream subclass LocalMediaStream and its stop method. Firefox is the only major browser to still ship LocalMediaStream. It is the type we use for the MediaStream that is returned from getUserMedia. The most breakage I e

Intent to unship: LocalMediaStream

2018-10-11 Thread Andreas Pehrson
I would like to unship the MediaStream subclass LocalMediaStream and its stop method. Firefox is the only major browser to still ship LocalMediaStream. It is the type we use for the MediaStream that is returned from getUserMedia. The most breakage I expect is for the removal of the stop method, b

Intent to unship: AudioStreamTrack and VideoStreamTrack

2018-10-11 Thread Andreas Pehrson
I would like to unship the MediaStreamTrack subclasses AudioStreamTrack and VideoStreamTrack. Firefox is the only major browser implementing these classes and they don't add anything other than the type. They were removed from the spec in 2014, https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-main/commit/d9424

Re: Extension to integrate Searchfox features in Phabricator

2018-10-11 Thread Marco Castelluccio
Thanks for the report, I had built it really quickly without actually looking into perf. I think the issue should be fixed in the newest version of the extension (0.2.1), let me know if it isn't (I couldn't reproduce it). - Marco. P.S.: Should you find other problems, you can file issues at http