Re: TypeError: %d format: a number is required, not float when building Firefox 52.4.1esr in Linux from Scratch

2017-11-04 Thread Botond Ballo
> File > "/root/sources/firefox-52.4.1esr/toolkit/components/telemetry/gen-event-data.py", > line 82, in write_common_event_table > e.dataset), > TypeError: %d format: a number is required, not float I haven't come across this error before, nor did a quick search turn up anything. I would suggest

Re: Pulsebot in #developers

2017-11-04 Thread Kris Maglione
For what it's worth, I quite like having pulsebot in #developers. I'll admit the channel feels different since pulsebot started reporting there. But I've also seen a lot of discussions started based on some commit it reported. And a lot of the time, I only even think to check #developers when I

Re: Pulsebot in #developers

2017-11-04 Thread Tim Taubert
+1 A separate channel sounds like a great idea. And it will help dealing with two very different kinds of information. On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 5:38 PM, Simon Sapin wrote: > On 04/11/17 17:21, Zibi Braniecki wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> The only thing I'd like to see from pulsebot on developers is: >> >>

Re: Pulsebot in #developers

2017-11-04 Thread Simon Sapin
On 04/11/17 17:21, Zibi Braniecki wrote: +1 The only thing I'd like to see from pulsebot on developers is: "26 commits have been merged from autoland into mozilla-central. List:http://..."; Even that would probably be still be high traffic. A separate channel would allow interested people t

Re: Pulsebot in #developers

2017-11-04 Thread Zibi Braniecki
+1 The only thing I'd like to see from pulsebot on developers is: "26 commits have been merged from autoland into mozilla-central. List: http://..."; zb. ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/d

Re: Pulsebot in #developers

2017-11-04 Thread Tom Ritter
+1. I would love pulsebot to get it's own channel I can get mention alerts on, and have developers just be development chat. On Nov 4, 2017 8:13 AM, "Kartikaya Gupta" wrote: > +1. I also find myself less likely to read the backscroll because of the > high volume of pulsebot messages. > > Thanks

Re: Pulsebot in #developers

2017-11-04 Thread Kartikaya Gupta
+1. I also find myself less likely to read the backscroll because of the high volume of pulsebot messages. Thanks for bringing this up! On Nov 4, 2017 07:45, "Philipp Kewisch" wrote: > Hey Folks, > > I'm a big fan of having development discussions in the open, and in the > past #developers has

Pulsebot in #developers

2017-11-04 Thread Philipp Kewisch
Hey Folks, I'm a big fan of having development discussions in the open, and in the past #developers has been the prime place to do that. Even if the benefit may not be apparent vs. having a private discussion or using a closed channel, I think this is one of many ways to increase interest within t