At one point the steps at
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Platform/GFX/Quantum_Render#Testing_third-party_rust_library_changes
were known to work. I don't know if they have since been broken.
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 4/28/17 1:05 PM, Josh Matthews wrote:
>>
>> Has anybo
On 4/28/17 1:05 PM, Josh Matthews wrote:
Has anybody been able to make this work?
I _think_ I made it work recently-ish, like so:
1) Modify toolkit/library/rust/Cargo.toml with the relevant [replace] bit.
2) Run "cargo vendor" and watch it fail because of something I never
figured out.
3
I just tried moving my changes into third_part/rust/rust-cssparser. I
also needed to modify the Cargo.toml there to update the paths to
cssparser-macros and procedural-masquerade because they are vendored as
separate crates, rather than in-library dependencies. At this point I
was still hitting
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> Rather, the policy is
> that we will move to requiring all new features to have HTTPS [0].
We should probably discuss that again at some point, since it's not
meaningfully enforced and I don't think it has consensus within
Mozilla either. It
There is this bug which the Cargo team is planning to work on to help
with these problems, but it hasn't been implemented yet that I know
of.
https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues/2649#issuecomment-279615299
jack.
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Bobby Holley wrote:
> I definitely made thi
I definitely made this work at some point:
https://hg.mozilla.org/try/rev/18dc070e0308
The main difference with what you seem to be doing is that my version
points directly into third-party/rust, which I think is preferable anyway.
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 10:05 AM, Josh Matthews
wrote:
> Back i
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 11:02 PM, Frederik Braun wrote:
> On 28.04.2017 05:56, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> > On 04/27/2017 08:09 AM, Frederik Braun wrote:
> >> On 27.04.2017 13:56, smaug wrote:
> >>> On 04/25/2017 04:38 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> On 04/24/2017 06:04 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> >>
Back in February there was a discussion about how hard it is to modify
vendored Rust crates for Stylo. I can't actually find any solution to
that problem - the general idea appears to be "add a [replace] section
to a Cargo.toml and run cargo update", but I have not been able to make
that work y
I've invited you to fill in the following form:
Web Platform Tests Survey
To fill it in, visit:
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScsbrVikqdnH32Qs-hV8YWgBi6kb5QRJtYG3KGqHba2eO2Dzw/viewform?c=0&w=1&usp=mail_form_link
Hi All,
The Product Integrity Automation Harnesses team would like your
9 matches
Mail list logo