Re: Intent to ship: css multi-column properties (unprefixed)

2016-10-12 Thread jensimmons
I would recommend that we ship support for column-span before we unprefix column. Shipping only part of a specification like this is risky for interop and web compat. Let's get all of it working behind a prefix, and then unprefix it all at once. (And fix the bugs asap. I've got a bug demo page

Re: Intent to ship: css multi-column properties (unprefixed)

2016-10-12 Thread Mike Taylor
On 10/7/16 5:07 PM, neerjapanch...@gmail.com wrote: Note that we do not yet support the "column-span" property -- that's covered here: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=616436 So what's the plan for column-span, exactly? We just got a report[1] that the CSSWG site[2] is busted (lol

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Web of Things Working Group

2016-10-12 Thread Martin Thomson
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Tantek Çelik wrote: > Security is the number one problem for anything "ot" (iot, wot, > wotever), I agree with this sentiment, but I don't think that we need to insist that a new W3C group solve these issues. I'm very much concerned with the question of how a ne

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Web of Things Working Group

2016-10-12 Thread Tantek Çelik
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Martin Thomson wrote: > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 6:21 AM, Benjamin Francis > wrote: >> Much more compelling is the member submission from EVRYTHNG which also forms >> the basis of the book, Building the Web of Things. > > Yes, that is a much clearer articulation o

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Web of Things Working Group

2016-10-12 Thread Martin Thomson
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 6:21 AM, Benjamin Francis wrote: > Much more compelling is the member submission from EVRYTHNG which also forms > the basis of the book, Building the Web of Things. Yes, that is a much clearer articulation of a vision. It starts going off the rails in a few places as it g

Re: Dynamically linking libxul into a non-Firefox program for testing

2016-10-12 Thread Mike Hommey
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 04:42:14PM +0300, Henri Sivonen wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 1:03 AM, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 06:24:33PM +0300, Henri Sivonen wrote: > >> For benchmarking purposes, I'd like to call uconv from a Rust > >> program. Since building uconv separately

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Web of Things Working Group

2016-10-12 Thread Benjamin Francis
On 12 October 2016 at 02:00, Martin Thomson wrote: > Does anyone at Mozilla intend to join this working group? I see no > Mozilla members in the IG. > Yes, in Connected Devices we have recently started looking at this area in some detail and I think we should seriously consider joining the Worki

Re: W3C Proposed Recommendation: HTML 5.1

2016-10-12 Thread Chris Hutten-Czapski
Can you provide any details (either inline, or a sampling of links) to summarize the broader concerns that might not be encapsulated in the document itself? On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 9:46 PM, L. David Baron wrote: > A W3C Proposed Recommendation is available for the membership of W3C > (including

Usability improvements for Firefox automation initiative - Status update #7

2016-10-12 Thread Armen Zambrano G.
On this update we will look at the progress made in the last two weeks. A reminder that this quarter’s main focus is on: * Debugging tests on interactive workers (only Linux on TaskCluster) * Improve end to end times on Try (Thunder Try project) For all bugs and priorities you can check out the

Re: Dynamically linking libxul into a non-Firefox program for testing

2016-10-12 Thread Henri Sivonen
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 1:03 AM, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 06:24:33PM +0300, Henri Sivonen wrote: >> For benchmarking purposes, I'd like to call uconv from a Rust program. >> Since building uconv separately from Gecko hasn't really been >> maintained, I figured that I'd export a