On 10/11/16 6:57 PM, Bobby Holley wrote:
Most development seems to happen under the WHATWG, which hosts the specs
that implementors look at and the umbrella under which they discuss. The
W3C then occasionally publishes arbitrary snapshots, which don't have any
particular technical utility but, by
Oups, sent the wrong link/bug number for the cloudsovercuba issue.
Updated the list with the correct one.
On 10/10/2016 4:18 PM, Cornel Ionce wrote:
Hi everyone,
Here's the list of new issues found and filed by the Desktop Release
QA Team last week, *October 3**- October 7* (week 40).
Add
Hey all,
Due to an unfortunate bug that went undiscovered until we migrated to
Heroku last week, Perfherder currently isn't giving reliable results.
I hope to have this fixed within the next couple of days
(https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1309294). No data should
be lost, so we'll
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 12:52 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
> My initial reaction would be to worry about whether there's
> properly-incubated material here that's appropriate to charter a
> working group for, or whether this is more of a (set of?) research
> projects. W3C has an existing Interest Gr
Yeah, from my not-super-informed perspective this is the primary benefit we
get from W3C publication of stuff that's developed elsewhere.
Most development seems to happen under the WHATWG, which hosts the specs
that implementors look at and the umbrella under which they discuss. The
W3C then occas
On Tuesday 2016-10-11 14:49 +0200, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> > Speaking as someone who is at best a consumer of WebIDL, what's the argument
> > for doing a snapshot at this time?
>
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2016J
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> Speaking as someone who is at best a consumer of WebIDL, what's the argument
> for doing a snapshot at this time?
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2016JulSep/0004.html
is presumably the argument. Those pointing out this ar
Speaking as someone who is at best a consumer of WebIDL, what's the
argument for doing a snapshot at this time?
-Ekr
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 11:24 PM, Anne van Kesteren
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 11 October 2016, L. David Baron wrote:
>
> > But given that it is worthwhile to advance snapshots of st
On 11-10-16 03:00, Gerald Squelart wrote:
> It seems this tightening is now preventing us from using ALSA:
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1247056#c167
>
> Coincidentally, we have just disabled ALSA by default, but the code
> is still there and can be enable in builds, so it'd be n
9 matches
Mail list logo
