Re: Want to learn TLS certificate verification best practices

2016-10-04 Thread Ben Cottrell
Hi Gervase, On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 09:49:20AM +0100, Gervase Markham wrote: > This question might be better off in mozilla.dev.tech.crypto. OK, understood. Thanks for the redirect. Although, you've given me enough to chew on already that I'm not likely to immediately go post over there, either.

Intent to ship: TouchEvents (Windows), touch-action (all platforms), accessible caret

2016-10-04 Thread Kartikaya Gupta
In Firefox 52 I intend to ship support for TouchEvents on Windows e10s. TouchEvent support has already been enabled on Android for a long time and has been enabled on Linux e10s as well (if you have MOZ_USE_XINPUT2=1 in your environment). The pref that controls this feature is dom.w3c_touch_events.

Re: upcoming meeting announcement - intermittent orange hacking

2016-10-04 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
Given the platform-wide D&I meeting scheduled for the same date and time, is this going to be rescheduled for this week? Thanks! On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 3:01 PM, jmaher wrote: > Every 2 weeks on Friday at 9 PDT [1] we will be hosting a meeting to > discuss intermittent oranges. The format will

Re: Removal of B2G from mozilla-central

2016-10-04 Thread Axel Hecht
On 04/10/16 17:40, Fabrice Desre wrote: On 10/04/2016 08:34 AM, Axel Hecht wrote: I'd favor to remove at least anything related to l10n from b2g. It never really worked, and is a half-maintained copy of the almost-working stuff in mobile. In my local branches that try to create a test on broke

Re: Removal of B2G from mozilla-central

2016-10-04 Thread Axel Hecht
On 04/10/16 12:16, Gabriele Svelto wrote: * b2g ~20K lines which would also drop considerably due to the removal of the APIs, completely self-contained I'd favor to remove at least anything related to l10n from b2g. It never really worked, and is a half-maintained copy of the almost-worki

Re: Removal of B2G from mozilla-central

2016-10-04 Thread Fabrice Desre
On 10/04/2016 08:34 AM, Axel Hecht wrote: I'd favor to remove at least anything related to l10n from b2g. It never really worked, and is a half-maintained copy of the almost-working stuff in mobile. In my local branches that try to create a test on broken l10n infrastructure, both mobile and b2

Re: Removal of B2G from mozilla-central

2016-10-04 Thread Gabriele Svelto
On 04/10/2016 01:22, Gregory Szorc wrote: > https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/search?q=gonk seems to > contradict your assertion that gonk is well-contained. I thought that the analysis in my first post was sufficiently detailed but here's one with line numbers to get a more accurate idea: