I met with Mike earlier today and answered a few of his mechanics questions
(with the help of Osmose)[0].
Timing for his add-on is end of Q3.
I've taken the action item to help coordinate testing around this add-on
over the next couple of weeks.
Thanks!
[0] https://pad.mocotoolsprod.net/p/cbs2h
On Wednesday, June 29, 2016 at 7:37:51 PM UTC+3, jl...@mozilla.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 28, 2016 at 2:35:22 PM UTC-7, David Baron wrote:
>
> >
> > Why is it vital to opt jobs but less so for debug jobs?
>
> you're right. I worded this poorly. I mean more that opt builds are part of
> the c
On Tuesday, June 28, 2016 at 2:35:22 PM UTC-7, David Baron wrote:
>
> Why is it vital to opt jobs but less so for debug jobs?
you're right. I worded this poorly. I mean more that opt builds are part of the
critical path: they are the actual builds that we promote to releases and
therefore more
I am not using MozReview yet, because I lack answers for the 2 following
questions:
Is MozReview safe for hosting security patches yet?
no. mozreview will prevent you from pushing a patch associated with a
bug that isn't public.
there's parts of the mozreview infrastructure that make that c
On 06/28/2016 06:44 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
As of a few minutes ago, when you land commits from MozReview they will be
pushed to https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland instead of
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound.
[…]
Please follow bug 1266863 if you wish to track changes
I want to inform that, the porting the last WebIDL interfaces using custom
worker binding, is finished. URL and XMLHttpRequest APIs have been
'rewritten' in order to use the standard codegen output.
Next step will be to simplify the WebIDL codegen.py removing all the custom
'worker' support.
b
__
6 matches
Mail list logo
