On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 9:20 AM, Benjamin Smedberg
wrote:
>
>
> On 3/10/2016 5:25 PM, Mike Hommey wrote:
>
>>
>> It's unfair to mention those populations by percentage of the global
>> Firefox population.
>>
>
> Why do you think this is unfair? This is about making the best use of our
> limited e
Hi,
Assuming it sticks, GCC 4.8 is now the minimum GCC version required to
build Firefox/Gecko. Details in bug 1175546, most notably comment 2.
Mike
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-plat
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 9:20 AM, Benjamin Smedberg
wrote:
> On 3/10/2016 5:25 PM, Mike Hommey wrote:
>> It's unfair to mention those populations by percentage of the global
>> Firefox population.
>
> Why do you think this is unfair? This is about making the best use of our
> limited engineering/te
We've had this conversation several times in the last few years and I think
I've finally figured out why it has always felt subtly wrong.
Our share of users on older platforms is disproportionally high compared to
the market in general because of our decline in market share. People who
don't want
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 12:20:30PM -0500, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
> We intend to do the following things:
>
> * add version checking to the builds so that they refuse to run on these
> versions of MacOS
If we change the macos target version, that's not possible. The
resulting binaries can't even
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 6:08 PM, wrote:
> That does raise the question, however, of how such a credential differs from,
> say:
>
> * A cookie
> * A random nonce in localStorage/IDB
> * A non-extractable WebCrypto key
The idea is that these are all less persistent. When you clear
storage/cookies
On 3/10/2016 5:25 PM, Mike Hommey wrote:
It's unfair to mention those populations by percentage of the global
Firefox population.
Why do you think this is unfair? This is about making the best use of
our limited engineering/testing/QA resources, and so what really matters
is the total impa
On Thursday, March 10, 2016 at 11:27:34 PM UTC-5, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 5:56 AM, Axel Nennker wrote:
> > no password generation help by the UA
>
> I agree with MattN here, not doing this eliminates much of the
> advantage of having a password manager. Or do you have a p
On Thursday, March 10, 2016 at 2:50:10 PM UTC-5, Kris Maglione wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 10:44:24AM -0800, Devan Shah wrote:
> >This happens in side extension only (works fine on web standalone), i will
> >try to extract a simple reproducible scenario.
> >
> >Is there any way to simulate a
On Thursday, March 10, 2016 at 2:42:14 PM UTC-5, Ted Mielczarek wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016, at 01:23 PM, Devan Shah wrote:
> > hello
> >
> > When I set a custom property such as element.listofSomething = [] and
> > then build the list and add it back to the same element. Then this
> > element i
Am Freitag, 11. März 2016 05:27:34 UTC+1 schrieb Martin Thomson:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 5:56 AM, Axel Nennker wrote:
> > no password generation help by the UA
>
> I agree with MattN here, not doing this eliminates much of the
> advantage of having a password manager. Or do you have a plan to
On Thursday 2016-03-10 02:17 -0800, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 11:53 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
> > Although we've participated in the development of this work in the
> > community group, this is an area that we're becoming less involved
> > in.
> >
> > We're also concern
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 8:57 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> It seemed like there was some really promising explorations happening
> for a while regarding developing a better API than the current
> contentEditable behavior. Did that go anywhere?
http://w3c.github.io/editing/ ? It's still going strong
Generally speaking, I find it really hard to reason about what we
should do regarding clipboard events and drag'n'drop events without
taking a larger look at the sad story that rich-text-editing on the
web is today.
It seemed like there was some really promising explorations happening
for a while
14 matches
Mail list logo
