On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 8:15 AM, Daniel Holbert wrote:
> (3) False positives: There are many "legitimate" ways that authors can
> use prefixed properties
Yep, you convinced me with this.
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https
On 12/31/2015 01:15 PM, Daniel Holbert wrote:
> (1) Dubious effectiveness:
[...]
> (2) Dubious usefulness: Given that these prefixed features will now
> Just Work in Firefox, and given that we're saying they're de-facto part
> of the web & committing to supporting them (and so are all other moder
On 12/31/2015 11:37 AM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> If we intend to continue to support these,
(We do.)
> and particularly if we
> anticipate more prefixed rules in future
(Happily, I don't anticipate too many more of these -- at least, the
space of -webkit-prefixed features is bounded, because impl
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Daniel Holbert wrote:
> Summary:
> A good chunk of the web today (and particularly the mobile web)
> effectively relies on -webkit prefixed CSS properties & features. We
> wish we lived in a world where web content always included
> standards-based fallback (or a
Daniel, Mike, and the whole compat team, thank you for diligently
figuring out all the nasty details here and pushing this contentious
"feature" forward.
This is a tough balance for the good of our users, and I'm grateful
for all the thought and careful consideration you have put into it.
We note
Yay!
(I agree that it's sad that we need to do this, but still "yay" for
being more compatible with the web).
/ Jonas
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 10:40 PM, Daniel Holbert wrote:
> Summary:
> A good chunk of the web today (and particularly the mobile web)
> effectively relies on -webkit prefixed C
6 matches
Mail list logo
