Well, this wouldn't be the first time that we are not as clear
communicating our intents as we thought or should. Sorry about that.
Thanks for getting in touch with the OS/2 maintainer. We definitely need
to spread the word asap. I hope that Rust can be ported to OS/2 and
other Tier-3 platforms bu
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 8:15 PM, Robert O'Callahan
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 11:09 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>
>> This is certainly something one could consider, but it it seems like it
>> confers a major
>> advantage on the vendor vis-a-vis everyone else. If we're going to have
>> an add-
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 11:09 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> This is certainly something one could consider, but it it seems like it
> confers a major
> advantage on the vendor vis-a-vis everyone else. If we're going to have an
> add-on
> mechanism, I don't see why vendors can't use it too.
>
I thin
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 8:02 PM, Robert O'Callahan
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 9:29 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 1:36 AM, Martin Thomson wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Robert O'Callahan
>>> wrote:
>>> > On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Eric Rescorla
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 9:29 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 1:36 AM, Martin Thomson wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Robert O'Callahan
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>> >
>> >> (4) Have the APIs hidden behind access controls
On 12/14/15 7:36 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Cameron Kaiser
wrote:
That said, I kind of object to the fact that no one brought this up until
I noticed it in passing, and the work to get Rust up on a tier-3 platform
-- a language that currently has no relevance to t
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Cameron Kaiser
wrote:
> Replying to a couple messages at once.
>
> On 12/14/15 2:19 PM, Mike Hoye wrote:
>
>> On 2015-12-14 4:06 PM, Justin Dolske wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/14/15 2:51 AM, Ted Mielczarek wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]Obviously this isn't something we like to see,
Replying to a couple messages at once.
On 12/14/15 2:19 PM, Mike Hoye wrote:
On 2015-12-14 4:06 PM, Justin Dolske wrote:
On 12/14/15 2:51 AM, Ted Mielczarek wrote:
[...]Obviously this isn't something we like to see, but
we shouldn't let the support of non-Tier 1 platforms guide our decision
m
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 1:36 AM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Robert O'Callahan
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> >
> >> (4) Have the APIs hidden behind access controls that need to be enabled
> by
> >> an extension
> >> (but a trivi
On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Cameron Kaiser
wrote:
> This would essentially mandate, then, that Gecko can only be built on
> platforms with a Rust toolchain. That may be desirable, but it would
> probably bust some of the obscure Tier-3 platforms and it would definitely
> bust TenFourFox (we
On 2015-12-14 4:06 PM, Justin Dolske wrote:
On 12/14/15 2:51 AM, Ted Mielczarek wrote:
[...]Obviously this isn't something we like to see, but
we shouldn't let the support of non-Tier 1 platforms guide our decision
making to that extent. Enabling Rust components in Gecko is important
work, and
On Saturday, December 12, 2015 at 4:19:55 PM UTC-6, Cameron Kaiser wrote:
> On 12/4/15 10:43 AM, jmath...@mozilla.com wrote:
> > On Friday, December 4, 2015 at 11:08:08 AM UTC-6, Armen Zambrano G. wrote:
> >> LastPass bring the browser to a crawl making it almost impossible to
> >> use. If we have
On Sunday, December 13, 2015 at 9:12:59 PM UTC-6, Daniel Veditz wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 4:36 AM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>
> > On 2015-12-04 19:43, jmath...@mozilla.com wrote:
> >
> >> Not an issue since initial rollout to beta and release will be to users
> >> who do not have addons installed
On 27/11/15 15:50, Gavin Sharp wrote:
> No, that's not right. There's an important distinction between
> "finding malicious JS code" and "finding _all_ malicious JS code". The
> latter is impossible, but the former isn't.
>
> Proving "the validator won't catch everything" isn't particularly
> rele
Hi everyone,
Here's the list of new issues found and filed by the Desktop Manual QA
team last week (Week 49: November 30 - December 04).
Additional details on the team's priorities last week, as well as the
plans for the current week are available at:
https://public.etherpad-mozilla.org/
Hi everyone,
Here's the list of new issues found and filed by the Desktop Manual QA
team last week (Week 50: December 07 - December 11).
Additional details on the team's priorities last week, as well as the
plans for the current week are available at:
https://public.etherpad-mozilla.org/
For Android, we are planning to start sending key metrics in a mobile "core
data" ping. We're designing the specifics of that ping here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ap5Z48Rh4t1r5lKmDAVCHNWpLS4nJIG4abZmw0nQiq4/edit#heading=h.my2y0xqb6c91
We haven't started implementation work on this yet, s
Hello -
Those responsible for Android-related FHR-based metrics are not aware of
the timeline for Android's transition, and I doubt we're prepared for that
transition at this point. It'd be great to know the timeline for this. The
bug linked to above does not include that information.
~ Hamilton
Hi all,
Just a quick note to say that ES6 Classes (
https://hacks.mozilla.org/2015/07/es6-in-depth-classes/) are going to ride
the trains with 45. This will hopefully be quite useful for the Firefox
developer experience, as there have been many requests, both internal and
external, for classes sup
On 12/14/15 2:51 AM, Ted Mielczarek wrote:
[...]Obviously this isn't something we like to see, but
we shouldn't let the support of non-Tier 1 platforms guide our decision
making to that extent. Enabling Rust components in Gecko is important
work, and outweighs the value of supporting Firefox on
( re-posting this from firefox-dev at dcamp's suggestion, sorry if this
feels
like a duplicate thread to you )
The e10s team looked at bug 1078121[1] this morning and asked how
concerned I am about it. I responded in comment 7 ( link below ) and I
*think* my workarounds are reasonable, however I w
On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Nicholas Nethercote
wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Cameron Kaiser wrote:
>>
>> This would essentially mandate, then, that Gecko can only be built on
>> platforms with a Rust toolchain. That may be desirable, but it would
>> probably bust some of the ob
On Sun, Dec 13, 2015, at 09:27 PM, Nicholas Nethercote wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Bobby Holley
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I've been wondering about this. There's a big difference between (a)
> >> permitting Rust components (while still allowing fallback C++
> >> equivalents) and (b) mand
23 matches
Mail list logo
