Re: Intent to ship: referrerpolicy attribute

2015-12-03 Thread Jonas Sicking
I think our implementation still has the problem that specifying referrerpolicy="none-when-downgrade" on an element has no effect. This is because the ReferrerPolicy enum uses the same value for RP_Unset, RP_Default and RP_No_Referrer_When_Downgrade. In general, that enum is a mess :( Would be go

Re: WebUSB

2015-12-03 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > 1) What I suggested: Whitelist vendor origins for access to their devices > and have vendor-hosted pages ("Web drivers"?) expose "safe" API to > third-party applications. > 2) Design a permissions API that one way or another lets users aut

Leaving hg.mozilla bug.mozilla to github for the leaving complicated infrastructure of mozilla.

2015-12-03 Thread Yonggang Luo
I think the relationship between Thunderbird/SeaMonkey and gecko-dev should be like the relation ship between Atom editor vs Electron. So there is no need that Thunderbird/SeaMonkey chasing the mozilla-central. And considerate the hard for contributing code in mozilla infrastructure for thunderbird

Re: SPS Profiles are now captured for entire subprocess lifetime

2015-12-03 Thread Kartikaya Gupta
\o/ Does this get us all the way to "profile talos runs with e10s enabled", or are there still pieces missing for that? IIRC this set of patches was a prerequisite for being able to do that. On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Mike Conley wrote: > Just a heads up that there have been recent developm

SPS Profiles are now captured for entire subprocess lifetime

2015-12-03 Thread Mike Conley
Just a heads up that there have been recent developments with regards to gathering SPS profiles from multiple processes. Bug 1103094[1] recently landed in mozilla-central, which makes it so that if a subprocess starts up _after_ profiling has already been started in the parent, then the subprocess

Re: Intent to implement and ship: FIDO U2F API

2015-12-03 Thread smaug
On 12/02/2015 11:37 PM, Frederic Martin wrote: As I said in the other email, I don't understand how this could be implemented when the spec has left the >key piece undefined, as far as I see. You are completely right ! For now, FIDO 2 is currently being written (far far far from finished) and

Transitioning from FHR to Telemetry

2015-12-03 Thread Georg Fritzsche
TL;DR: The old FHR system is going away, use Telemetry. We have been working on migrating the FHR data sources to Telemetry for a while now, but realized there has been no proper notice going around so far. As of Firefox 43, we have disabled FHR upload on Desktop. Instead we are now collecting opt

Re: Dan Stillman's concerns about Extension Signing

2015-12-03 Thread Jorge Villalobos
On 11/30/15 1:53 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: > On 2015-11-30 10:29 AM, David Rajchenbach-Teller wrote: >> Could we perhaps organize a MozLando workshop to discuss add-ons >> security? > > I think you need to reach out to the add-ons team. I was not involved > in any of the design process; I just hap

Re: When the beta version of firefox with e10s would be released?

2015-12-03 Thread Frederik Braun
On 03.12.2015 12:55, Yonggang Luo wrote: > On Thursday, December 3, 2015 at 4:57:28 PM UTC+8, Dave Townsend wrote: >> The developer edition already ships with e10s so you can test against that. > Indeed, I am looking for more stable version I use Developer Edition (aurora) for many years now and h

Re: When the beta version of firefox with e10s would be released?

2015-12-03 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Le 03/12/2015 14:14, WaltS48 a écrit : > On 12/03/2015 01:32 AM, Yonggang Luo wrote: >> I am looking for it to developing mutli-process based firefox addons/apps >> > > I forget the bug number, but I understand multi-process was turned on for > 7.5% of beta users with the release of 43.0b8. Nope,

Re: When the beta version of firefox with e10s would be released?

2015-12-03 Thread WaltS48
On 12/03/2015 01:32 AM, Yonggang Luo wrote: I am looking for it to developing mutli-process based firefox addons/apps I forget the bug number, but I understand multi-process was turned on for 7.5% of beta users with the release of 43.0b8. Check Troubleshooting Information and if you see Mul

Re: When the beta version of firefox with e10s would be released?

2015-12-03 Thread Yonggang Luo
On Thursday, December 3, 2015 at 4:57:28 PM UTC+8, Dave Townsend wrote: > The developer edition already ships with e10s so you can test against that. Indeed, I am looking for more stable version > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 10:32 PM, Yonggang Luo wrote: > > I am looking for it to developing mutli-p

Re: When the beta version of firefox with e10s would be released?

2015-12-03 Thread Dave Townsend
The developer edition already ships with e10s so you can test against that. On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 10:32 PM, Yonggang Luo wrote: > I am looking for it to developing mutli-process based firefox addons/apps > ___ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform