Looks like people are trying to track this down in:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1206107
They just landed a patch to mozilla-inbound, which should hit Nightly
either tomorrow or Thursday. Sounds like it's not totally clear if the
patch will fix the crashes, and I'm not sure anyone
https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/report/index/bp-b55094f8-2046-43d1-8ca7-17eb42150923
https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/report/index/bp-6b654016-533d-47ec-b593-937972150923
https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/report/index/bp-b30c14dc-d6e4-4919-9e0d-9b1fc2150923
https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/report/index
Courtesy of Rick Byers, who is promoting an increased focus on interop
within Blink/Chromium, it's now possible for "trusted" Mozilla developers
to get editbugs access to Chromium's bug tracker, initially just a small
number of us. I just got granted access. So if you want access, let me know
and w
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 11:16 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>> The api has been extensively discussed with all browser vendors and has
>> changed substantially in response to this
>
> Can you please point me to those changes and to the security analysis?
Security wasn't discussed much in these convers
On Tuesday, September 22, 2015 at 3:02:21 AM UTC-7, smaug wrote:
> That document is from 2015 ;)
Oh. Fun!
> The example in that chapter is "This property should return the same promise
> every time it is retrieved, until the image moves backward from the
> loaded state into the unloaded state.
The Web API documentation community meeting, with representatives from
the technical evangelism and the API development teams, will take place
on Thursday at 8 AM Pacific Time (see http://bit.ly/1GghwBR for your
time zone).
Typical meetings include news about recent API development progress and
fu
FYI
Bug: 366559
Release: On the trains for 44
Summary: Brotli is a new generation lossless compression format. Its
incompatible with zlib, but anywhere from roughly 20% to 40% denser and
roughly as fast for decompression. HTTP content encodings are negotiated
for on-the-wire transmission and do n
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> This draft is a good sketch, but it's not a specification from which
> we can create long term interoperable implementations.
E.g., it claims to build on the FileSystem API, but defines an
additional path member on Directory without men
On 22/09/2015 15:46, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Jonathan Watt wrote:
2. https://wicg.github.io/directory-upload/proposal.html
It still seems bad that this is not being integrated into whatwg/html
directly.
It's not that this isn't going to happen (I would cert
On 22/09/2015 15:16, Eric Rescorla wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 7:07 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
There are spec drafts written for most of this feature, with remaining
parts on the way.
To the extent to which you're referring to:
https://wicg.github.io/directory-upload/proposal.html
I find i
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Jonathan Watt wrote:
> 2. https://wicg.github.io/directory-upload/proposal.html
It still seems bad that this is not being integrated into whatwg/html
directly. A ton of things are basically not defined right now. It's
also unclear how this feature should work toge
On 22/09/2015 00:27, Richard Barnes wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Jonathan Watt wrote:
I don't think directory picking is bad - there are many sites with
legitimate uses. I think it's right that we need to think about the
security implications though, and members of the security team
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 7:07 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>
> On Sep 21, 2015 11:57, "Eric Rescorla" wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Jonas Sicking
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Note that this, similarly to clipboard integration, is already exposed
> >> to the web through flash. So the main go
On Sep 21, 2015 11:57, "Eric Rescorla" wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>
>> Note that this, similarly to clipboard integration, is already exposed
>> to the web through flash. So the main goal of this feature is to
>> enable developers to migrate off of flash an
On Sep 21, 2015 11:57, "Eric Rescorla" wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>
>> Note that this, similarly to clipboard integration, is already exposed
>> to the web through flash. So the main goal of this feature is to
>> enable developers to migrate off of flash an
It looks like most of the Security discussion is happening in this bug now:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=907707
--Jet
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 9:18 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 8:48 PM, Eric Shepherd
> wrote:
>
> > Eric Rescorla wrote:
> >
> > I think there
On 09/22/2015 09:49 AM, Zibi Braniecki wrote:
There seem to be an interesting section in Promises doc from 2001 about
multi-state promises -
https://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/promises-guide#state-transitions
That document is from 2015 ;)
One of the things that we are working on is a spec fo
2015년 9월 22일 화요일 오후 2시 44분 17초 UTC+9, David Rajchenbach-Teller 님의 말:
> Have you tried
> ./mach package
> ?
>
> On 22/09/15 07:09, aesop8...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Hi, Mike
> >
> > i'm using MozillaBuild 2.0. and to make installer run the command after
> > build.
> >
> > ../build/pymake/make.py
18 matches
Mail list logo
