On 5/13/15 7:35 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
I would steer people in the direction of Assert.jsm, specifically
Assert.deepEqual
This should be used very very carefully.
As a very simple example, using this (or worse yet notDeepEqual) in any
test that tries to check for equality of Window objects
On 2015/05/13 23:24, Andrew Halberstadt wrote:> I don't believe
marionette currently works on Thunderbird, but that's
> most likely due to hardcoded assumptions than any deep technical
> reasons. It could probably be made to work with a little bit of effort,
> it's just that to date, no one has t
Ouch, there was a line near the end.
Successfully installed jsbridge-2.4.14 mozmill-1.5.16
This is from a local C-C TB build.
CI
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Matthew N.
wrote:
> "In JavaScript, == is preferred to ===." from
> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Developer_guide/Coding_Style#Operators
Ahh, that's where it was hiding. Can we reverse that statement please?
___
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Ehsan Akhgari
> wrote:
> > ise() was an alias to is() as of bug 949614. I landed bug 1154275 on
> > inbound today which removes ise() and replaces its usages with is().
> Since
> > is() now does a === comp
Way back yonder in September we enabled logging by default on all builds. The
world did not end. The |--disable-logging| flag remained which in theory, does
in fact disable logging but none of our default builds use it, and
unsurprisingly we occasionally started breaking custom builds that attem
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> ise() was an alias to is() as of bug 949614. I landed bug 1154275 on
> inbound today which removes ise() and replaces its usages with is(). Since
> is() now does a === comparison by default, there should be no reason to use
> ise().
\o/
I
ise() was an alias to is() as of bug 949614. I landed bug 1154275 on
inbound today which removes ise() and replaces its usages with is(). Since
is() now does a === comparison by default, there should be no reason to use
ise().
Cheers,
--
Ehsan
___
dev
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Ms2ger wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 05/13/2015 09:54 PM, Andrew Halberstadt wrote:
> > As mentioned previously in another post, work is under way to
> > remove the flavor specific mochitest commands (e.g mach
> > mochitest-plain,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/13/2015 09:54 PM, Andrew Halberstadt wrote:
> As mentioned previously in another post, work is under way to
> remove the flavor specific mochitest commands (e.g mach
> mochitest-plain, mach mochitest-browser etc.).
>
Does this include `mochites
On 13/05/15 04:13 PM, Brian Grinstead wrote:
Does this include subsuites like devtools? There is currently a bug
on file in which `mach mochitest` doesn’t work with devtools tests
(1122590). Until that is resolved, if mochitest-devtools was removed
then running these tests would become the hard
Does this include subsuites like devtools? There is currently a bug on file in
which `mach mochitest` doesn’t work with devtools tests (1122590). Until that
is resolved, if mochitest-devtools was removed then running these tests would
become the harder-to-remember `./mach mochitest browser/dev
As mentioned previously in another post, work is under way to remove the
flavor specific mochitest commands (e.g mach mochitest-plain, mach
mochitest-browser etc.). This is being tracked in bug 1164597 [1].
Bug description pasted below:
As part of an effort to make running tests as easy and intu
Hello all,
At the end of last year we made some changes to make mozharness more
easy to run outside of the Release Engineering VPN.
Mozharness is the python harness that runs most jobs that show up on
Treeherder.
Tooltool has been re-written recently [1], you will now need a token on
your machine
I don't believe marionette currently works on Thunderbird, but that's
most likely due to hardcoded assumptions than any deep technical
reasons. It could probably be made to work with a little bit of effort,
it's just that to date, no one has tried.
I thought thunderbird was using a very out-of
On 13 May 2015, at 04:40, Philip Chee wrote:
> On 12/05/2015 20:23, Henrik Skupin wrote:
>> To being able to better spread work around we basically
>> have chosen the wider known Marionette framework.
>
> Thunderbird currently uses mozmill. Will Marionette[1] be available for
> Thunderbird? Is th
I think it's time I made an official decision here. I think Ehsan's
proposal makes a lot of sense both as good engineering and because we know
Google has already proved it for us. I approve.
Ehsan, will you please make the necessary changes to our style guide?
--BDS
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 3:48
17 matches
Mail list logo
