Re: How does stl_wrappers works in mozilla building system?

2015-04-17 Thread Nicholas Alexander
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Yonggang Luo wrote: > I can not found the cause that how mozilla building with stl_wrappers. > What do you want to know? https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/search?tree=mozilla-central&q=stl_wrapper&redirect=true clearly shows a Python script that generates t

How does stl_wrappers works in mozilla building system?

2015-04-17 Thread Yonggang Luo
I can not found the cause that how mozilla building with stl_wrappers. ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

How does stl_wrappers works in mozilla building system?

2015-04-17 Thread Yonggang Luo
I can not found the cause that how mozilla building with stl_wrappers. ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Re: Intent to deprecate: Insecure HTTP

2015-04-17 Thread Robert Kaiser
Karl Dubost schrieb: Henri, great points, about… Le 14 avr. 2015 à 19:29, Henri Sivonen a écrit : Currently, the UI designation for http is neutral while the UI designation for mixed content is undesirable. I think we should make the UI designation of plain http undesirable once x% the sites t

Re: Intent to deprecate: Insecure HTTP

2015-04-17 Thread Martin Thomson
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > As I said early on in this thread, this claim often comes up, but is > never backed up. Where is the research that shows we need public > caching proxies? This is early days, but I'm working with a partner on two things: - working out

Re: Intent to deprecate: Insecure HTTP

2015-04-17 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 6:46 PM, Mike Hoye wrote: > I don't see where that document speaks to the impact of TLS on caching > proxies, which I'm guessing is the source of the performance hit Andrew > mentions. > > It's been a while since I've looked, but in Canada (and probably other > geographical

Re: Intent to deprecate: Insecure HTTP

2015-04-17 Thread Bob Clary
On 04/17/2015 09:46 AM, Mike Hoye wrote: On 2015-04-17 12:20 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 6:13 PM, wrote: As a non-tech person, the only thing I know is https means my browser runs even slower on DSL. This has already been addressed earlier in the thread. HTTPS has ne

Re: Intent to deprecate: Insecure HTTP

2015-04-17 Thread Mike Hoye
On 2015-04-17 12:20 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 6:13 PM, wrote: As a non-tech person, the only thing I know is https means my browser runs even slower on DSL. This has already been addressed earlier in the thread. HTTPS has negligible performance impact. See e.g.:

Re: Intent to deprecate: Insecure HTTP

2015-04-17 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 6:13 PM, wrote: > As a non-tech person, the only thing I know is https means my browser runs > even slower on DSL. This has already been addressed earlier in the thread. HTTPS has negligible performance impact. See e.g.: https://istlsfastyet.com/ > Meanwhile: "Depre

Re: Intent to deprecate: Insecure HTTP

2015-04-17 Thread andrewnemethy
As a non-tech person, the only thing I know is https means my browser runs even slower on DSL, which is all that is available in many rural areas. Would this not mean that I'd be back to dial-up times to load a story or post, all of which are larded up with ads and videos these days? At 7 mbps t

Re: Intent to deprecate: Insecure HTTP

2015-04-17 Thread Henri Sivonen
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 3:33 AM, Karl Dubost wrote: > Le 14 avr. 2015 à 19:29, Henri Sivonen a écrit : >> Currently, the UI designation for http is neutral while the UI >> designation for mixed content is undesirable. I think we should make >> the UI designation of plain http undesirable once x%