Asynchronous initialization of NPAPI plugins is enabled by default on
desktop Aurora 39. It is controlled by the dom.ipc.plugins.asyncInit pref.
Since this feature is not yet 100% e10s compatible, the Aurora channel
is the first time that the feature is seeing widespread deployment.
Because of
You've now sent 3 "please unsubscribe me" posts -- I don't think those
have any effect, aside from spamming everyone else on the list.
If you want to unsubscribe, you can do so via this link (which is
included at the bottom of every email you receive from this list):
https://lists.mozilla.org/l
Please unsubscribe me
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 7:32 PM Mike Hommey wrote:
> And now, nsMemory::Alloc, nsMemory::Free and nsMemory::Realloc are gone
> as well.
>
> Mike
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 02:59:20PM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > In the next few weeks, there is going to be a redu
Please unsubscribe me
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 7:22 PM Eric Shepherd (Sheppy)
wrote:
> FWIW documenting and providing examples for this is a candidate for a
> Q2 deliverable for the MDN content team. I do not make promises yet,
> however. ;)
>
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 9:37 PM, Tantek Çelik
> wrot
Please unsubscribe me
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 9:26 PM Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 3:00 AM, ben turner (bent)
> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, April 1, 2015 at 2:12:40 PM UTC-7, somb...@gmail.com
> wrote:
> >> - Crash-wise, are we talking about only the parent process crashing, or
> >>
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 3:00 AM, ben turner (bent)
wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 1, 2015 at 2:12:40 PM UTC-7, somb...@gmail.com wrote:
>> - Crash-wise, are we talking about only the parent process crashing, or
>> are we talking about the child process crashing too?
>
> I was talking just about the p
On Wednesday, April 1, 2015 at 2:12:40 PM UTC-7, somb...@gmail.com wrote:
> - Crash-wise, are we talking about only the parent process crashing, or
> are we talking about the child process crashing too?
I was talking just about the parent process. If the child process crashes then
whether or not
On Wednesday, April 1, 2015 at 1:40:07 PM UTC-7, somb...@gmail.com wrote:
> I don't think it's set to true for B2G right now.
Oops, you're right. It looks like it's false everywhere currently.
-bent
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozil
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015, at 05:12 PM, Andrew Sutherland wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2015, at 03:02 PM, ben turner (bent) wrote:
> > If a crash or power loss occurs at just
> > the right moment then the transaction will be lost/rolled back. It should
> > still be impossible to ever see database corruption t
And now, nsMemory::Alloc, nsMemory::Free and nsMemory::Realloc are gone
as well.
Mike
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 02:59:20PM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the next few weeks, there is going to be a reduction in the number of
> our memory allocator wrappers/functions, for essentially the fol
FWIW documenting and providing examples for this is a candidate for a
Q2 deliverable for the MDN content team. I do not make promises yet,
however. ;)
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 9:37 PM, Tantek Çelik wrote:
> From the bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1138658
>
> This will be on by d
Should we add documentation for this to the Developer Guide on MDN? We
cover a lot of the development process there, so it may be wise to
include this information there, unless someone can think of a good
reason not to.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 9:08 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> Ah, sorry, I misunder
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015, at 03:02 PM, ben turner (bent) wrote:
> If a crash or power loss occurs at just
> the right moment then the transaction will be lost/rolled back. It should
> still be impossible to ever see database corruption though. This will
> mean faster delivery of "complete" events, and m
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015, at 03:02 PM, ben turner (bent) wrote:
> In the meantime, if the "dom.indexedDB.experimental" pref is set
> (defaults to |false| in Firefox and |true| in B2G, I think)
I don't think it's set to true for B2G right now. I don't see such a
mapping in
https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozil
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Jet Villegas wrote:
> We've started implementing the Web Animations API [1] with very early
> collaboration with the Dev Tools team and have seen very promising results.
> Is that a model we can continue to follow or modify to suit?
While I was not directly involv
Hi folks,
Just a heads up that some big-ish changes to IndexedDB landed today on m-c.
1. The main change that affects users is bug 1112702, which switched IndexedDB
databases to be non-durable by default.
2. The the schema version for all databases has changed, so once you open a
database on tr
On 01.04.2015 08:28, Tantek Çelik wrote:
> One of the suggested additions to "intent to implement" emails:
>
> https://wiki.mozilla.org/WebAPI/ExposureGuidelines#Intent_to_Implement
>
> is a statement regarding Security & Privacy concerns, because those
> have often been noted as brief summary st
17 matches
Mail list logo
