https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1093480
Comment 0:
I think I will break this patch up into several incremental patches:
* Inline API documentation, errors and basic infrastructure (stack of
transactions, PromiseAction, isInTransaction)
* doTransaction
* undoTransaction
* redoTransac
On Sunday, November 2, 2014 11:45:52 AM UTC-8, David Rajchenbach-Teller wrote:
> This looks like toolkit/ stuff.
> If you can segment this in small patches, I can try and review it.
>
> Cheers,
> David
How small are we talking? Other than making the tests a separate patch, I'm
not sure splitti
在 2014年10月28日星期二UTC+8上午4时32分46秒，Kip Gilbert写道：
> As of October 28, 2014 I intend to turn on by default CSSOM-View
> Scroll-Behavior CSS Property and CSSOM-View DOM Extensions related to
> smooth scrolling. They have been developed behind the
> layout.css.scroll-behavior.enabled and
> layout.css.sc
On Saturday, November 1, 2014 7:48:11 PM UTC, Andreas Gal wrote:
> I am using Nightly on Yosemite and power use is pretty atrocious. The battery
> menu tags Firefox Nightly as a significant battery hog, and I can confirm
> this from the user experience perspective as well. My battery time is a
>
> -Original Message-
> From: dev-platform [mailto:dev-platform-
> bounces+rstrong=mozilla@lists.mozilla.org] On Behalf Of Robert
Kaiser
> Sent: Saturday, November 1, 2014 6:47 PM
> To: dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
> Subject: Re: Breakdown of Firefox full installer
>
> Mike Hommey sc
On 10/31/14 11:03 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 2014-10-31 12:51 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
All problems in computer science can be solved by another level of
indirection. The problem here is that Git users need to push to the
canonical Mercurial repositories (inbound, try, etc). You will be
hearing
On 2014-11-03 12:32 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
On 02/11/14 18:13, Mike Hoye wrote:
"We found that blocking on a slow connection used consistently more
power than idle. This could be solely due to network traffic, but
network traffic was very periodic (1 packet in and 1 packet out per
second), thu
On 10/31/14 7:21 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 2014-10-31 1:48 AM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
a) Landing code to inbound, fx-team, aurora, etc
I have the following git alias:
hgp = show -M -C --binary --full-index --format=\"From: %an
<%ae>%nSubject: %s%n%n%b\" -U8
And my workflow for landing code i
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 02:03:35PM -0400, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> On 2014-10-31 12:51 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
> >As has been said on this list before, switching canonical to Git just
> >isn't going to happen. Valid reasons have been given before. But here's
> >a new one: we don't need to.
> >
> >I
On 02/11/14 18:13, Mike Hoye wrote:
"We found that blocking on a slow connection used consistently more
power than idle. This could be solely due to network traffic, but
network traffic was very periodic (1 packet in and 1 packet out per
second), thus much of the work could likely be attributed t
Test Informant report for 2014-11-02.
State of test manifests at revision 0b81c10a9074.
Using revision 8230834302c9 as a baseline for comparisons.
Showing tests enabled or disabled between 2014-10-26 and 2014-11-02.
86% of tests across all suites and configurations are enabled.
Summary
---
+dev-gaia
I only just came across this thread as I don't follow dev-platform very
closely, dev-gaia is a better place to discuss issues about Gaia. Comments
inline...
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Karl Dubost wrote:
> In Firefox 2.2.0, each time you try to enter a letter, there are a list of
Great work Nick.
As an FYI, we also have this page about FxOS perf testing:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Apps/Build/Performance/Firefox_OS_performance_testing
I think what you’ve done is right though - no need to link all the Firefox OS
perf stuff from the main perf page. It probably nee
Awesome to see this mail, Andre!
And remember that we do have the pages set up on MDN ready to be filled in also.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Web_Speech_API
Once this is shipped, do you think we can find some time to start collaborating
on these docs?
Chris Mills
Senior
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Mike de Boer wrote:
>
> > On 01 Nov 2014, at 20:50, Kyle Huey wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 12:42 PM, wrote:
> >> The reviewer should understand asynchronous Promise operations,
> preferably the OS.File promises
> >
> > We shouldn't be landing new code
> On 01 Nov 2014, at 20:50, Kyle Huey wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 12:42 PM, wrote:
>> The reviewer should understand asynchronous Promise operations, preferably
>> the OS.File promises
>
> We shouldn't be landing new code that uses Promise.jsm in mozilla-central.
Well, that surely has
On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 11:34 AM, wrote:
> What a terrible news! I have many C++ XPCOMs evaluating xpath expressions.
> They must be coded in C++ for high speed.
Given the modern JIT and DOM bindings, I am very doubtful that you will
encounter JS-based or binding-based bottlenecks for xpath expr
17 matches
Mail list logo
