On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 9:25 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Robert O'Callahan
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Ehsan Akhgari
>> wrote:
>>
>> Can we keep track of where the stream comes from, and make sure to taint
>> > the images that can come out of them
On 2014/10/24 13:46, Anthony Jones wrote:
I just wanted to give a heads up to everyone that we enabled Media
Source Extensions on nightly for WebM/VP9. This brings Adaptive
Streaming capability to Firefox video playback. The feature is not
complete so the pref will automatically turn off when it
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Robert O'Callahan
wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Ehsan Akhgari
> wrote:
>
> Can we keep track of where the stream comes from, and make sure to taint
> > the images that can come out of them similar to the way that we taint
> cross
> > origin images by
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Ehsan Akhgari
wrote:
Can we keep track of where the stream comes from, and make sure to taint
> the images that can come out of them similar to the way that we taint cross
> origin images by default to prevent them from being read back on the
> client? I think wi
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 8:48 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> 2) We could perhaps have some concept of taking a snapshot of the
> current page or indicated fragment so we can analyze it
> asynchronously. Then if a known-bad thing was found, such as a plugin,
> native form control, or non-CORS cross
It's hard to determine exactly what's happening because your post
doesn't explain where you're using this variable, but note that extern
variables cannot be used across module boundaries. For example,
nsBrowserApp.cpp get compiled into firefox.exe, whereas most of our code
gets compiled in xul
On 2014-10-24 4:08 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Jet Villegas wrote:
Kicking off this thread to get a discussion on:
1. Web-facing or not?
I think we have to make it web facing. If we want the web to be
competitive with other platforms, which I hope we do, we have
I believe for b2g you can use the following which will only rebuild gecko:
cd objdir-gecko/
../gecko/mach ide eclipse
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Botond Ballo wrote:
>> A new command has now landed: './mach ide eclipse'
>
> Nice! Thanks for all your work on this.
>
>> will perform the follo
http://w3c.github.io/mediacapture-image/
- Original Message -
From: "Eric Rescorla"
To: "Milan Sreckovic"
Cc: "Markus Stange" , "Stephen Pohl" ,
"Jet Villegas" , "L. David Baron" ,
"Ehsan Akhgari" , "Matt Woodrow" ,
"Jonas Sicking" , "Nicolas Silva" ,
"Robert O'Callahan" , "mozilla.d
Ah. So this seems to be a rather more limited function than the one that we
are currently providing, which is a full motion video of the screen/window.
I haven't decided yet whether I think it makes sense to have a "snapshot"
API
as a separate thing, as opposed to just capturing the video stream a
Just in case this makes it into bugzilla, this is the bug that’s tracking the
original proposal:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744100
--
- Milan
On Oct 24, 2014, at 11:44 , Eric Rescorla wrote:
> Here is my writeup of the security issues with this from a while ago:
> http://lis
Here is my writeup of the security issues with this from a while ago:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webrtc/2013Mar/0024.html
As MT says, we already are shipping screen sharing in FF 33. It's
currently whitelisted, but otherwise it's fairly complete.
-Ekr
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 1:0
As of today we also have:
* Win64 opt talos
* Win64 pgo builds, tests and talos
Both of them running on Windows 8 64-bit test machines.
On graphs.m.o you should recognize the platform as WINNT 6.2 x64.
cheers,
Armen
On 14-10-21 04:00 PM, Chris AtLee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just a quick note that we'r
On 24/10/14 10:08, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>> 2. Security/Privacy concerns
>
> so we'd have to be careful with how we do it. For example always
> showing an on-screen indicator indicating that the screen is currently
> shared. And reminding the user that password etc can be read by the
> remote party
I just wanted to give a heads up to everyone that we enabled Media
Source Extensions on nightly for WebM/VP9. This brings Adaptive
Streaming capability to Firefox video playback. The feature is not
complete so the pref will automatically turn off when it gets to
beta/release if we do nothing.
You
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 10/24/14, 3:48 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>> Then if a known-bad thing was found, such as a plugin,
>> native form control, or non-CORS cross-origin image,
>
> Or link, right? Otherwise you leak :visited state.
I was not trying to be e
On 10/24/14, 3:48 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Then if a known-bad thing was found, such as a plugin,
native form control, or non-CORS cross-origin image,
Or link, right? Otherwise you leak :visited state.
-Boris
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-pl
Well, for one thing, never perform I/O on the main thread. It really
kills performance, as you witness. No amount of batching is going to be
sufficient.
Also, why don't you use our stream classes?
Cheers,
David
On 24/10/14 14:36, Josip Maras wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm extending the Firefox source in
On 10/23/14 9:20 PM, Nicholas Nethercote wrote:
Hello.
Our command-line option handling is *interesting*. Did you know that:
- our options work in -foo form and --foo form;
- they are case-insensitive;
- this holds for both short options (e.g. -h) and long options (e.g. -help).
I did in fact
Hi,
I'm extending the Firefox source in order to log some information during web
app execution, for example event, script executions, new element creations,
removals, attribute modifications, etc. Since these things occur often, when I
load a more demanding application (e.g. facebook), everythi
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Andreas Tolfsen wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>> 2) We could perhaps have some concept of taking a snapshot of the
>> current page or indicated fragment so we can analyze it
>> asynchronously. Then if a known-bad thing was fou
I think it would be useful to distinguish between a one-off screenshot
and screen sharing/streaming here.
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Jet Villegas wrote:
> 1. Web-facing or not?
Both. Perhaps with different security models.
> 2. Security/Privacy concerns
Many. If granting permission to
Jonas,
Le 24 oct. 2014 à 10:08, Jonas Sicking a écrit :
> It would also be cool to enable sharing just a particular app, or a
> particular browser tab. This is a problem that I see in native apps
> often. At some video conference someone wants to share a slideshow,
> but they end up showing their
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Jet Villegas wrote:
> Kicking off this thread to get a discussion on:
>
> 1. Web-facing or not?
I think we have to make it web facing. If we want the web to be
competitive with other platforms, which I hope we do, we have to
expose this functionality.
However it
Le 24 oct. 2014 à 09:48, Anne van Kesteren a écrit :
> 1) We could ask for permission…
yes. To take account that sometimes people forget they gave a permission. So
maybe it should be a one-off permission only. (Just thinking)
Some other things that could be done:
* A visual notification and/o
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Robert O'Callahan
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Jet Villegas wrote:
>> 1. Web-facing or not?
>
> I don't think we can.
1) We could ask for permission...
2) We could perhaps have some concept of taking a snapshot of the
current page or indicated fra
26 matches
Mail list logo
