OK. I think it might worth a mention in that document that even the latest
compiler by now may produce wasteful result.
Xidorn
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 2:29 PM, David Major wrote:
> Mixing types will likely produce unexpected and/or wasteful results.
> Examples at
> http://randomascii.wordpress.
Mixing types will likely produce unexpected and/or wasteful results. Examples
at
http://randomascii.wordpress.com/2010/06/06/bit-field-packing-with-visual-c/. I
believe that is still true in VS2013.
David
- Original Message -
> From: "Xidorn Quan"
> To: dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
Hi,
I read the C++ portibility guide [1], in which it is said that all
bitfields should have the same type, or some compiler may mishandle the
code. Is that still true for the compiler set we currently use? The
compiler the doc mentioned is MSVC++8 which I believe we have dropped. Can
we use diffe
Filed https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1085767
-Nick
On 21/10/14 7:34 am, Stefan Sitter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> are there plans to switch the Thunderbird builders from VS2010 to VS2013
> as well?
>
> /Stefan
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-pla
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
> Hurrah!
Indeed. Thank you, Poiru, for all your work sanding down rough edges
throughout the codebase.
Nick
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.or
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 12:09:40PM -0400, Mike Hoye wrote:
> On 2014-10-20 11:56 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> >On 2014-10-20 11:44 AM, Gijs Kruitbosch wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>Can you or someone else in the know update
> >>https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Developer_Guide/Build_Instructions/Win
Hurrah!
Rob
--
oIo otoeololo oyooouo otohoaoto oaonoyooonoeo owohooo oioso oaonogoroyo
owoiotoho oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro owoiololo oboeo
osouobojoeocoto otooo ojouodogomoeonoto.o oAogoaoiono,o oaonoyooonoeo
owohooo
osoaoyoso otooo oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro,o o‘oRoaoc
I think that’s manageable.
-Jeff
On Oct 20, 2014, at 2:54 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> So I just spoke with Callek about his plans to move SeaMonkey off of their
> existing Windows 2003 builders that cannot install Visual Studio 2012 or
> newer, and it seems like Dec 15th is a date that will pr
So I just spoke with Callek about his plans to move SeaMonkey off of their
existing Windows 2003 builders that cannot install Visual Studio 2012 or
newer, and it seems like Dec 15th is a date that will probably work fine
for SM, and that is still within the Gecko 37 cycle. Jeff, can we hold off
th
Hi,
are there plans to switch the Thunderbird builders from VS2010 to VS2013
as well?
/Stefan
On 14.10.2014 08:10, David Major wrote:
VS2013 is now on inbound and all Windows builds are green.
(Win64 builds were actually switched late last week, as they are
unaffected by trains.)
Please fi
I went ahead and fixed the instructions. Most of it should now be up-to-date.
On 20 October 2014 18:44, Gijs Kruitbosch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can you or someone else in the know update
> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Developer_Guide/Build_Instructions/Windows_Prerequisites
> and friends, or
On 2014-10-20 11:56 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 2014-10-20 11:44 AM, Gijs Kruitbosch wrote:
Hi,
Can you or someone else in the know update
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Developer_Guide/Build_Instructions/Windows_Prerequisites
and friends, or (if you don't like wiki software, don't
On 20/10/2014 16:56, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 2014-10-20 11:44 AM, Gijs Kruitbosch wrote:
Hi,
Can you or someone else in the know update
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Developer_Guide/Build_Instructions/Windows_Prerequisites
and friends, or (if you don't like wiki software, don't want
On 2014-10-20 11:44 AM, Gijs Kruitbosch wrote:
Hi,
Can you or someone else in the know update
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Developer_Guide/Build_Instructions/Windows_Prerequisites
and friends, or (if you don't like wiki software, don't want to create
an account, or have other reasons
Hi,
Can you or someone else in the know update
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Developer_Guide/Build_Instructions/Windows_Prerequisites
and friends, or (if you don't like wiki software, don't want to create
an account, or have other reasons not to want to do this...) provide
instruct
On 2014-10-20 11:44 AM, Gijs Kruitbosch wrote:
Hi,
Can you or someone else in the know update
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Developer_Guide/Build_Instructions/Windows_Prerequisites
and friends,
Working on it.
- mhoye
___
dev-platform mai
I'm planning to move and flatten content/{base,html,media,svg,xul}/ into dom/
in a few days barring any unforeseen test reordering issues. For example:
content/base/public/nsINode.h=> dom/base/nsINode.h
content/html/content/src/HTMLElement.cpp => dom/html/HTMLElement.cpp
content/
Test Informant report for 2014-10-18.
State of test manifests at revision 33c0181c4a25.
Using revision f547cf19d104 as a baseline for comparisons.
Showing tests enabled or disabled between 2014-10-12 and 2014-10-18.
86% of tests across all suites and configurations are enabled.
Full Report
---
Hi,
this mail made me laugh, because I can tell very similar stories with
different examples. (Not sure if :) or :( )
On the positive side, I think we got a lot better since then by both,
fixing broken designs and code, and also applying learned lessons to new
sub-systems.
Best regards
Thomas
A
Ehsan Akhgari writes:
> On 2014-10-13, 10:35 PM, Kan-Ru Chen (陳侃如) wrote:
>> Jonas Sicking writes:
>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Kan-Ru Chen (陳侃如)
>>> wrote:
Jonas Sicking writes:
> This will only be exposed to privileged and certified apps, right?
> Other content
On 17/10/2014 00:32, Nicholas Nethercote wrote:
> Thanks for the replies so far! I deliberately left this question vague
> to see what kind of responses people would give. But mostly I'm
> interested in code whose awfulness impacts users in a serious way.
> Ones where refactoring/rewriting efforts
21 matches
Mail list logo
