On 7/17/2014 9:18 PM, Botond Ballo wrote:
std::shared_ptr is mostly unusable in Gecko code because there's no way to
specify whether you need thread-safety or not (usually you don't). There
should be a way to specify whether you want to pay the cost of thread
safety when using it.
I would like t
> > There should be a way to indicate in a switch statement whether you intend
> > to cover all the cases:
> >
> >enum A { a, b, c };
> >
> >switch (x) {
> > case a:
> > return true;
> > case b:
> > return false;
> >}
> >
> > There needs to be a way to t
> The Committee is meeting next week in Rapperswil, Switzerland. I will be
> attending.
>
> ...
>
> Shortly after the meeting I will blog about what happened there - stay
> tuned!
I just published my blog post about the Rapperswil committee meeting:
http://theres-waldo.ca/2014/07/17/trip-report-
gandalf, stas, and I talked about this a bit, and we intend to settle
with my mental parser plus a compare-locales warning:
Broken escapes just pass through, \u -> u, but we'll extend
compare-locales to issue a warning on the l10n dashboard in those cases.
The work is tracked in https://bugzi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Dave,
There exists a template [1] for this kind of email. Using it makes it
much easier to be sure the important questions are addressed. You're
missing the answers to all questions except the bug number. (That bug,
I should note, will need to live
5 matches
Mail list logo
